TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychological support for patients with cancer
T2 - Evidence review and suggestions for future directions
AU - Hulbert-Williams, Nicholas J.
AU - Beatty, Lisa
AU - Dhillon, Haryana M.
N1 - Funding Information:
L.B. is funded by a Cancer Fellowship (Cancer Council).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - Purpose of review Psychological distress and mental health comorbidity are common in cancer. Various therapeutic frameworks have been used for interventions to improve psychological wellbeing and quality of life in cancer patients with mixed results. This article reviews contributions to that literature published since January 2017. Recent findings The majority of new psychological intervention research in cancer has used cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) or mindfulness-based interventions. CBT has been considered a gold-standard intervention and recent evidence justifies continuation of this. Recent reviews call into question the validity of evidence for mindfulness-based interventions. A smaller number of trials using acceptance and commitment therapy, meta-cognitive therapy, dignity therapy and coaching have emerged, and whereas findings are promising, additional fully powered trials are required. Weaker evidence exists for counselling, support-based and narrative therapy interventions. Summary Efficacious, timely and acceptable psychological interventions are a necessary component of comprehensive cancer care. There is some way to go before the evidence conclusively points towards which interventions work for which cancer groups and for which specific outcomes. Methodological limitations must be addressed in future trials; at the forefront remains the need for fully powered, head-tohead comparison trials.
AB - Purpose of review Psychological distress and mental health comorbidity are common in cancer. Various therapeutic frameworks have been used for interventions to improve psychological wellbeing and quality of life in cancer patients with mixed results. This article reviews contributions to that literature published since January 2017. Recent findings The majority of new psychological intervention research in cancer has used cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) or mindfulness-based interventions. CBT has been considered a gold-standard intervention and recent evidence justifies continuation of this. Recent reviews call into question the validity of evidence for mindfulness-based interventions. A smaller number of trials using acceptance and commitment therapy, meta-cognitive therapy, dignity therapy and coaching have emerged, and whereas findings are promising, additional fully powered trials are required. Weaker evidence exists for counselling, support-based and narrative therapy interventions. Summary Efficacious, timely and acceptable psychological interventions are a necessary component of comprehensive cancer care. There is some way to go before the evidence conclusively points towards which interventions work for which cancer groups and for which specific outcomes. Methodological limitations must be addressed in future trials; at the forefront remains the need for fully powered, head-tohead comparison trials.
KW - cancer
KW - cognitive behavioural therapy
KW - psychological distress
KW - psychological intervention
KW - third-wave therapies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055518843&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055518843&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000360
DO - 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000360
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30074924
AN - SCOPUS:85055518843
SN - 1751-4258
VL - 12
SP - 276
EP - 292
JO - Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
JF - Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
IS - 3
ER -