Professional perceptions of barriers and facilitators from the implementation of a neonatal early supported transfer to home intervention for late preterm infants: A qualitative study

Oliver Hamer, Jennifer Kuroski, Richa Gupta, Louise Weaver-Lowe, Kathryn Berzins, Gill Thomson, Scott Lamont, Caroline Watkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Abstract
Introduction
Late preterm infants may have prolonged stay in hospital due to increased care needs and a lack of community support. A neonatal early supported transfer to home (NEST@Home) intervention was introduced. We explored professional perceptions of barriers and facilitators to implementation of NEST@Home.
Methods
Neonatal healthcare professionals in England participated in group interviews based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
Findings
Perceived barriers included lack of facilities, poor clinical buy-in, budget restraints, staff shortages, absence of policy, and a lack of commissioning support. Perceived facilitators to implementation included healthcare professional's positive attitudes, pre-discharge planning, parent education, parent training, and loan of monitoring equipment.
Conclusion
This study identified individual, interpersonal, and organisational features that may facilitate or impede the NEST@Home intervention. Further research is needed to identify how this intervention impacts outcomes, and to understand the experience of parents receiving NEST@Home.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-281
JournalJournal of Neonatal Nursing
Volume31
Issue number1
Early online date17 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2025

Keywords

  • Qualitative
  • neonatal
  • children
  • infants

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Professional perceptions of barriers and facilitators from the implementation of a neonatal early supported transfer to home intervention for late preterm infants: A qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this