Problems and potential of mineral magnetic measurements as a soil particle size proxy

C. Booth, M. Fullen, J. Walden, A. Worsley, S. Marcinkonis, A. Coker

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The use of mineral magnetic concentration parameters (χLF, χARM and SIRM) as a potential particle size proxy for soil samples collected from the Isle of Man (British Isles) is explored as an alternative means of normalizing particle size effects. Comparison of soil‐related analytical data by correlation analyses between each magnetic parameter and individual particle size classes (i.e. sand, silt and clay), more discrete intervals within classes (e.g. fine sand or medium silt) and cumulative size fractions (e.g. clay + fine silt) are reported. Both χLF and χARM parameters reveal significant (p <0.05; n = 46), but relatively weak (rs = 0.297 and 0.369), associations with clay content, while χLF, χARM and SIRM parameters have no significant relationship with sand and silt content or any discrete or cumulative size fractions. Contrary to earlier research findings, this indicates that magnetic measurements are not always a suitable particle size proxy and it is only certain environments and/or specific settings that are appropriate for granulometric normalization by this technique. However, if future researchers working in other soil settings can identify a formal predictable relationship, the technique is known to offer a simple, reliable, rapid, sensitive, inexpensive and non‐destructive approach that could be a valuable particle size proxy for normalizing particle size effects in soil contamination studies.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)151-158
    JournalJournal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management
    Volume16
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Problems and potential of mineral magnetic measurements as a soil particle size proxy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this