Prioritising references for systematic reviews with RobotAnalyst: A user study

Piotr Przybta, Austin J. Brockmeier, Georgios Kontonatsios, Marie-Annick Le Pogam, John McNaught, Erik von Elm, Kay Nolan, Sophia Ananiadou

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

17 Citations (Scopus)
75 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Screening references is a time‐consuming step necessary for systematic reviews and guideline development. Previous studies have shown that human effort can be reduced by using machine learning software to prioritise large reference collections such that most of the relevant references are identified before screening is completed. We describe and evaluate RobotAnalyst, a Web‐based software system that combines text‐mining and machine learning algorithms for organising references by their content and actively prioritising them based on a relevancy classification model trained and updated throughout the process. We report an evaluation over 22 reference collections (most are related to public health topics) screened using RobotAnalyst with a total of 43 610 abstract‐level decisions. The number of references that needed to be screened to identify 95% of the abstract‐level inclusions for the evidence review was reduced on 19 of the 22 collections. Significant gains over random sampling were achieved for all reviews conducted with active prioritisation, as compared with only two of five when prioritisation was not used. RobotAnalyst's descriptive clustering and topic modelling functionalities were also evaluated by public health analysts. Descriptive clustering provided more coherent organisation than topic modelling, and the content of the clusters was apparent to the users across a varying number of clusters. This is the first large‐scale study using technology‐assisted screening to perform new reviews, and the positive results provide empirical evidence that RobotAnalyst can accelerate the identification of relevant studies. The results also highlight the issue of user complacency and the need for a stopping criterion to realise the work savings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)470-488
JournalResearch Synthesis Methods
Volume9
Issue number3
Early online date28 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 28 Jun 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prioritising references for systematic reviews with RobotAnalyst: A user study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Przybta, P., Brockmeier, A. J., Kontonatsios, G., Le Pogam, M-A., McNaught, J., von Elm, E., Nolan, K., & Ananiadou, S. (2018). Prioritising references for systematic reviews with RobotAnalyst: A user study. Research Synthesis Methods, 9(3), 470-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1311