Practitioners as Rule Using Analysts: A Further Development of Process Knowledge in Social Work

M Sheppard, K Ryan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A new paradigm of ‘process knowledge’ has emerged in recent years, distinct from the dominant ‘product knowledge’ paradigm in social work. While the latter refers to existent knowledge, which may be applied, the former refers to the development of knowledge about the ‘methodology of practice decision making’, focusing on the processes by which judgements are made. At its heart is the emerging idea of a reflexivity for practice, but studies have been, until recently, theoretical. A very small number of empirical studies have begun to identify some key elements of process knowledge. These have developed a range of concepts relating to critical appraisal, hypothesis development and hypothesis testing which characterize social work process knowledge. These include, for example, focused attention, querying information, causal inferences, partial case, procedural, and speculative hypotheses. A process of quasi triangulation is characteristic of social work practice methodology, together with a combination of inductive and deductive thinking. This paper seeks to develop our understanding by focusing on how social workers develop and appraise hypotheses, and in particular how the substantive content of hypotheses emerges (these enable social workers to make sense of, define, and respond to, situations). To understand this, the notion of rules is used, and social workers emerge as analysts employing three types of rules: substantive, application, and practice rules. A significant link between process knowledge and the content of product knowledge is identified in the form of technical language. The concept of ‘probabilistic causation’ is identified as a key epistemological dimension in the conduct of rigorous practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-176
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume33
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Social Work
social work
social worker
Causality
Decision Making
Language
paradigm
hypothesis testing
triangulation
methodology
reflexivity
technical language
Social Workers
decision making

Cite this

@article{e13df4da5efe43e1af61004b9b4d4c1b,
title = "Practitioners as Rule Using Analysts: A Further Development of Process Knowledge in Social Work",
abstract = "A new paradigm of ‘process knowledge’ has emerged in recent years, distinct from the dominant ‘product knowledge’ paradigm in social work. While the latter refers to existent knowledge, which may be applied, the former refers to the development of knowledge about the ‘methodology of practice decision making’, focusing on the processes by which judgements are made. At its heart is the emerging idea of a reflexivity for practice, but studies have been, until recently, theoretical. A very small number of empirical studies have begun to identify some key elements of process knowledge. These have developed a range of concepts relating to critical appraisal, hypothesis development and hypothesis testing which characterize social work process knowledge. These include, for example, focused attention, querying information, causal inferences, partial case, procedural, and speculative hypotheses. A process of quasi triangulation is characteristic of social work practice methodology, together with a combination of inductive and deductive thinking. This paper seeks to develop our understanding by focusing on how social workers develop and appraise hypotheses, and in particular how the substantive content of hypotheses emerges (these enable social workers to make sense of, define, and respond to, situations). To understand this, the notion of rules is used, and social workers emerge as analysts employing three types of rules: substantive, application, and practice rules. A significant link between process knowledge and the content of product knowledge is identified in the form of technical language. The concept of ‘probabilistic causation’ is identified as a key epistemological dimension in the conduct of rigorous practice.",
author = "M Sheppard and K Ryan",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1093/bjsw/33.2.157",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "157--176",
journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
issn = "0045-3102",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

Practitioners as Rule Using Analysts: A Further Development of Process Knowledge in Social Work. / Sheppard, M; Ryan, K.

In: British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 33, 2003, p. 157-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practitioners as Rule Using Analysts: A Further Development of Process Knowledge in Social Work

AU - Sheppard, M

AU - Ryan, K

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - A new paradigm of ‘process knowledge’ has emerged in recent years, distinct from the dominant ‘product knowledge’ paradigm in social work. While the latter refers to existent knowledge, which may be applied, the former refers to the development of knowledge about the ‘methodology of practice decision making’, focusing on the processes by which judgements are made. At its heart is the emerging idea of a reflexivity for practice, but studies have been, until recently, theoretical. A very small number of empirical studies have begun to identify some key elements of process knowledge. These have developed a range of concepts relating to critical appraisal, hypothesis development and hypothesis testing which characterize social work process knowledge. These include, for example, focused attention, querying information, causal inferences, partial case, procedural, and speculative hypotheses. A process of quasi triangulation is characteristic of social work practice methodology, together with a combination of inductive and deductive thinking. This paper seeks to develop our understanding by focusing on how social workers develop and appraise hypotheses, and in particular how the substantive content of hypotheses emerges (these enable social workers to make sense of, define, and respond to, situations). To understand this, the notion of rules is used, and social workers emerge as analysts employing three types of rules: substantive, application, and practice rules. A significant link between process knowledge and the content of product knowledge is identified in the form of technical language. The concept of ‘probabilistic causation’ is identified as a key epistemological dimension in the conduct of rigorous practice.

AB - A new paradigm of ‘process knowledge’ has emerged in recent years, distinct from the dominant ‘product knowledge’ paradigm in social work. While the latter refers to existent knowledge, which may be applied, the former refers to the development of knowledge about the ‘methodology of practice decision making’, focusing on the processes by which judgements are made. At its heart is the emerging idea of a reflexivity for practice, but studies have been, until recently, theoretical. A very small number of empirical studies have begun to identify some key elements of process knowledge. These have developed a range of concepts relating to critical appraisal, hypothesis development and hypothesis testing which characterize social work process knowledge. These include, for example, focused attention, querying information, causal inferences, partial case, procedural, and speculative hypotheses. A process of quasi triangulation is characteristic of social work practice methodology, together with a combination of inductive and deductive thinking. This paper seeks to develop our understanding by focusing on how social workers develop and appraise hypotheses, and in particular how the substantive content of hypotheses emerges (these enable social workers to make sense of, define, and respond to, situations). To understand this, the notion of rules is used, and social workers emerge as analysts employing three types of rules: substantive, application, and practice rules. A significant link between process knowledge and the content of product knowledge is identified in the form of technical language. The concept of ‘probabilistic causation’ is identified as a key epistemological dimension in the conduct of rigorous practice.

U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/33.2.157

DO - 10.1093/bjsw/33.2.157

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 157

EP - 176

JO - British Journal of Social Work

JF - British Journal of Social Work

SN - 0045-3102

ER -