TY - JOUR
T1 - Physiotherapist-led exercise versus usual care (waiting-list) control for patients awaiting rotator cuff repair surgery: A pilot randomised controlled trial (POWER)
T2 - A pilot randomised controlled trial (POWER)
AU - Littlewood, Chris
AU - Moffatt, Maria
AU - Beckhelling, Jacqueline
AU - Davis, Daniel
AU - Burden, Adrian
AU - Pitt, Lisa
AU - Lalande, Stacey
AU - Maddocks, Catrin
AU - Stephens, Gareth
AU - Tunnicliffe, Helen
AU - Pawson, Jessica
AU - Lloyd, James
AU - Manca, Andrea
AU - Wade, Julia
AU - Foster, Nadine E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/11/1
Y1 - 2023/11/1
N2 - Background: Once a decision to undergo rotator cuff repair surgery is made, patients are placed on the waiting list. It can take weeks or months to receive surgery. There has been a call to move from waiting lists to ‘preparation’ lists to better prepare patients for surgery and to ensure it remains an appropriate treatment option for them. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, as measured by recruitment rates, treatment fidelity and follow-up rates, of a future multi-centre randomised controlled trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of undertaking a physiotherapist-led exercise programme while waiting for surgery versus usual care (waiting-list control). Design: Two-arm, multi-centre pilot randomised controlled trial with feasibility objectives in six NHS hospitals in England. Method: Adults (n = 76) awaiting rotator cuff repair surgery were recruited and randomly allocated to a programme of physiotherapist-led exercise (n = 38) or usual care control (n = 38). Results: Of 302 eligible patients, 76 (25%) were randomised. Of 38 participants randomised to physiotherapist-led exercise, 28 (74%) received the exercise programme as intended. 51/76 (67%) Shoulder Pain and Disability Index questionnaires were returned at 6-months. Of 76 participants, 32 had not received surgery after 6-months (42%). Of those 32, 20 were allocated to physiotherapist-led exercise; 12 to usual care control. Conclusions: A future multi-centre randomised controlled trial is feasible but would require planning for variable recruitment rates between sites, measures to improve treatment fidelity and opportunity for surgical exit, and optimisation of follow-up. A fully powered, randomised controlled trial is now needed to robustly inform clinical decision-making.
AB - Background: Once a decision to undergo rotator cuff repair surgery is made, patients are placed on the waiting list. It can take weeks or months to receive surgery. There has been a call to move from waiting lists to ‘preparation’ lists to better prepare patients for surgery and to ensure it remains an appropriate treatment option for them. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, as measured by recruitment rates, treatment fidelity and follow-up rates, of a future multi-centre randomised controlled trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of undertaking a physiotherapist-led exercise programme while waiting for surgery versus usual care (waiting-list control). Design: Two-arm, multi-centre pilot randomised controlled trial with feasibility objectives in six NHS hospitals in England. Method: Adults (n = 76) awaiting rotator cuff repair surgery were recruited and randomly allocated to a programme of physiotherapist-led exercise (n = 38) or usual care control (n = 38). Results: Of 302 eligible patients, 76 (25%) were randomised. Of 38 participants randomised to physiotherapist-led exercise, 28 (74%) received the exercise programme as intended. 51/76 (67%) Shoulder Pain and Disability Index questionnaires were returned at 6-months. Of 76 participants, 32 had not received surgery after 6-months (42%). Of those 32, 20 were allocated to physiotherapist-led exercise; 12 to usual care control. Conclusions: A future multi-centre randomised controlled trial is feasible but would require planning for variable recruitment rates between sites, measures to improve treatment fidelity and opportunity for surgical exit, and optimisation of follow-up. A fully powered, randomised controlled trial is now needed to robustly inform clinical decision-making.
KW - Randomised controlled trial
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Rotator cuff
KW - Rotator Cuff/surgery
KW - Pilot Projects
KW - Multicenter Studies as Topic
KW - Humans
KW - England
KW - Adult
KW - Waiting Lists
KW - Physical Therapists
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175608396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85175608396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/94efee0f-528c-33f0-b8d8-b99bb9408076/
U2 - 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102874
DO - 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102874
M3 - Article (journal)
C2 - 37926065
AN - SCOPUS:85175608396
SN - 2468-7812
VL - 68
SP - 1
EP - 7
JO - Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
JF - Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
M1 - 102874
ER -