Physiological and psychological effects of deception on pacing strategy and performance: a review

Hollie S Jones, Emily L Williams, Craig Bridge, David Marchant, Adrian Midgley, Domminic Micklewright, Lars McNaughton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of an optimal pacing strategy during exercise is to enhance performance whilst ensuring physiological limits are not surpassed, which has been shown to result in a metabolic reserve at the end of the exercise. There has been debate surrounding the theoretical models that have been proposed to explain how pace is regulated, with more recent research investigating a central control of exercise regulation. Deception has recently emerged as a common, practical approach to manipulate key variables during exercise. There are a number of ways in which deception interventions have been designed, each intending to gain particular insights into pacing behaviour and performance. Deception methodologies can be conceptualised according to a number of dimensions such as deception timing (prior to or during exercise), presentation frequency (blind, discontinuous or continuous) and type of deception (performance, biofeedback or environmental feedback). However, research evidence on the effects of deception has been perplexing and the use of complex designs and varied methodologies makes it difficult to draw any definitive conclusions about how pacing strategy and performance are affected by deception. This review examines existing research in the area of deception and pacing strategies, and provides a critical appraisal of the different methodological approaches used to date. It is hoped that this analysis will inform the direction and methodology of future investigations in this area by addressing the mechanisms through which deception impacts upon performance and by elucidating the potential application of deception techniques in training and competitive settings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1243-1257
JournalSports Medicine
Volume43
Issue number12
Early online date4 Sep 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Deception
Psychology
Research
Teaching
Theoretical Models

Cite this

@article{f58fe9ea4f5846e69b92c0d4e68a7029,
title = "Physiological and psychological effects of deception on pacing strategy and performance: a review",
abstract = "The aim of an optimal pacing strategy during exercise is to enhance performance whilst ensuring physiological limits are not surpassed, which has been shown to result in a metabolic reserve at the end of the exercise. There has been debate surrounding the theoretical models that have been proposed to explain how pace is regulated, with more recent research investigating a central control of exercise regulation. Deception has recently emerged as a common, practical approach to manipulate key variables during exercise. There are a number of ways in which deception interventions have been designed, each intending to gain particular insights into pacing behaviour and performance. Deception methodologies can be conceptualised according to a number of dimensions such as deception timing (prior to or during exercise), presentation frequency (blind, discontinuous or continuous) and type of deception (performance, biofeedback or environmental feedback). However, research evidence on the effects of deception has been perplexing and the use of complex designs and varied methodologies makes it difficult to draw any definitive conclusions about how pacing strategy and performance are affected by deception. This review examines existing research in the area of deception and pacing strategies, and provides a critical appraisal of the different methodological approaches used to date. It is hoped that this analysis will inform the direction and methodology of future investigations in this area by addressing the mechanisms through which deception impacts upon performance and by elucidating the potential application of deception techniques in training and competitive settings.",
author = "Jones, {Hollie S} and Williams, {Emily L} and Craig Bridge and David Marchant and Adrian Midgley and Domminic Micklewright and Lars McNaughton",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s40279-013-0094-1",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "1243--1257",
journal = "Sports Medicine",
issn = "0112-1642",
publisher = "Adis Online",
number = "12",

}

Physiological and psychological effects of deception on pacing strategy and performance: a review. / Jones, Hollie S; Williams, Emily L; Bridge, Craig; Marchant, David; Midgley, Adrian; Micklewright, Domminic; McNaughton, Lars.

In: Sports Medicine, Vol. 43, No. 12, 12.2013, p. 1243-1257.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physiological and psychological effects of deception on pacing strategy and performance: a review

AU - Jones, Hollie S

AU - Williams, Emily L

AU - Bridge, Craig

AU - Marchant, David

AU - Midgley, Adrian

AU - Micklewright, Domminic

AU - McNaughton, Lars

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - The aim of an optimal pacing strategy during exercise is to enhance performance whilst ensuring physiological limits are not surpassed, which has been shown to result in a metabolic reserve at the end of the exercise. There has been debate surrounding the theoretical models that have been proposed to explain how pace is regulated, with more recent research investigating a central control of exercise regulation. Deception has recently emerged as a common, practical approach to manipulate key variables during exercise. There are a number of ways in which deception interventions have been designed, each intending to gain particular insights into pacing behaviour and performance. Deception methodologies can be conceptualised according to a number of dimensions such as deception timing (prior to or during exercise), presentation frequency (blind, discontinuous or continuous) and type of deception (performance, biofeedback or environmental feedback). However, research evidence on the effects of deception has been perplexing and the use of complex designs and varied methodologies makes it difficult to draw any definitive conclusions about how pacing strategy and performance are affected by deception. This review examines existing research in the area of deception and pacing strategies, and provides a critical appraisal of the different methodological approaches used to date. It is hoped that this analysis will inform the direction and methodology of future investigations in this area by addressing the mechanisms through which deception impacts upon performance and by elucidating the potential application of deception techniques in training and competitive settings.

AB - The aim of an optimal pacing strategy during exercise is to enhance performance whilst ensuring physiological limits are not surpassed, which has been shown to result in a metabolic reserve at the end of the exercise. There has been debate surrounding the theoretical models that have been proposed to explain how pace is regulated, with more recent research investigating a central control of exercise regulation. Deception has recently emerged as a common, practical approach to manipulate key variables during exercise. There are a number of ways in which deception interventions have been designed, each intending to gain particular insights into pacing behaviour and performance. Deception methodologies can be conceptualised according to a number of dimensions such as deception timing (prior to or during exercise), presentation frequency (blind, discontinuous or continuous) and type of deception (performance, biofeedback or environmental feedback). However, research evidence on the effects of deception has been perplexing and the use of complex designs and varied methodologies makes it difficult to draw any definitive conclusions about how pacing strategy and performance are affected by deception. This review examines existing research in the area of deception and pacing strategies, and provides a critical appraisal of the different methodological approaches used to date. It is hoped that this analysis will inform the direction and methodology of future investigations in this area by addressing the mechanisms through which deception impacts upon performance and by elucidating the potential application of deception techniques in training and competitive settings.

U2 - 10.1007/s40279-013-0094-1

DO - 10.1007/s40279-013-0094-1

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 1243

EP - 1257

JO - Sports Medicine

JF - Sports Medicine

SN - 0112-1642

IS - 12

ER -