Peer review: A good but flawed system?

Bernie Carter

doi:10.1177/1367493517727320

Peer review: A good but flawed system?

Bernie Carter^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Edge Hill University

University of Tasmania

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial (journal)

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Editorial

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	233-235
Number of pages	3
Journal	Journal of Child Health Care
Volume	21
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493517727320
Publication status	Published - 1 Sept 2017

Keywords

peer review

Access to Document

10.1177/1367493517727320

Cite this

@article{c4bbe62e162d42718bb0d014127a7271,

title = "Peer review: A good but flawed system?",

abstract = "Editorial",

keywords = "peer review",

author = "Bernie Carter",

year = "2017",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/1367493517727320",

language = "English",

volume = "21",

pages = "233--235",

journal = "Journal of Child Health Care",

issn = "1367-4935",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peer review

T2 - A good but flawed system?

AU - Carter, Bernie

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Editorial

AB - Editorial

KW - peer review

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85028591539

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85028591539#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1177/1367493517727320

DO - 10.1177/1367493517727320

M3 - Editorial (journal)

AN - SCOPUS:85028591539

SN - 1367-4935

VL - 21

SP - 233

EP - 235

JO - Journal of Child Health Care

JF - Journal of Child Health Care

IS - 3

ER -

Peer review: A good but flawed system?

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this