Oxygen therapy: time to move on?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This analysis examines the roots of clinical practice regarding oxygen therapy and finds that some aspects have changed very little over the past 200 years. Oxygen is commonly prescribed and administered as a therapy across all healthcare settings, particularly for the treatment and management of respiratory conditions, both acute and chronic. Yet despite its widespread use and recent advances in understanding and guidance, poor practice and controversies regarding its use persist. This historical analysis highlights origins in practice that may suggest where the roots of these fallacies lie, highlighting potential ambiguities and myths that have permeated clinical and social contexts. It can be considered that based on clinical presumptions and speculation the prolific and injudicious use of oxygen was encouraged and the legacy for today’s practice seeded. The conjectures proposed here may enable modern day erroneous beliefs to be confronted and clinical practice to move on.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
JournalTherapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease
Volume8
Issue number6
Early online date9 Sep 2014
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 9 Sep 2014

Fingerprint

Oxygen
Therapeutics
Delivery of Health Care

Cite this

@article{ab48654c9b714c65b3c8dfb3b539d752,
title = "Oxygen therapy: time to move on?",
abstract = "This analysis examines the roots of clinical practice regarding oxygen therapy and finds that some aspects have changed very little over the past 200 years. Oxygen is commonly prescribed and administered as a therapy across all healthcare settings, particularly for the treatment and management of respiratory conditions, both acute and chronic. Yet despite its widespread use and recent advances in understanding and guidance, poor practice and controversies regarding its use persist. This historical analysis highlights origins in practice that may suggest where the roots of these fallacies lie, highlighting potential ambiguities and myths that have permeated clinical and social contexts. It can be considered that based on clinical presumptions and speculation the prolific and injudicious use of oxygen was encouraged and the legacy for today’s practice seeded. The conjectures proposed here may enable modern day erroneous beliefs to be confronted and clinical practice to move on.",
author = "Carol Kelly",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1177/1753465814549011",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease",
issn = "1753-4658",
publisher = "Sage",
number = "6",

}

Oxygen therapy: time to move on? / Kelly, Carol.

In: Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease, Vol. 8, No. 6, 09.09.2014, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Oxygen therapy: time to move on?

AU - Kelly, Carol

PY - 2014/9/9

Y1 - 2014/9/9

N2 - This analysis examines the roots of clinical practice regarding oxygen therapy and finds that some aspects have changed very little over the past 200 years. Oxygen is commonly prescribed and administered as a therapy across all healthcare settings, particularly for the treatment and management of respiratory conditions, both acute and chronic. Yet despite its widespread use and recent advances in understanding and guidance, poor practice and controversies regarding its use persist. This historical analysis highlights origins in practice that may suggest where the roots of these fallacies lie, highlighting potential ambiguities and myths that have permeated clinical and social contexts. It can be considered that based on clinical presumptions and speculation the prolific and injudicious use of oxygen was encouraged and the legacy for today’s practice seeded. The conjectures proposed here may enable modern day erroneous beliefs to be confronted and clinical practice to move on.

AB - This analysis examines the roots of clinical practice regarding oxygen therapy and finds that some aspects have changed very little over the past 200 years. Oxygen is commonly prescribed and administered as a therapy across all healthcare settings, particularly for the treatment and management of respiratory conditions, both acute and chronic. Yet despite its widespread use and recent advances in understanding and guidance, poor practice and controversies regarding its use persist. This historical analysis highlights origins in practice that may suggest where the roots of these fallacies lie, highlighting potential ambiguities and myths that have permeated clinical and social contexts. It can be considered that based on clinical presumptions and speculation the prolific and injudicious use of oxygen was encouraged and the legacy for today’s practice seeded. The conjectures proposed here may enable modern day erroneous beliefs to be confronted and clinical practice to move on.

U2 - 10.1177/1753465814549011

DO - 10.1177/1753465814549011

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease

JF - Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease

SN - 1753-4658

IS - 6

ER -