Oxygen therapy: time to move on?

Carol Kelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
106 Downloads (Pure)


This analysis examines the roots of clinical practice regarding oxygen therapy and finds that some aspects have changed very little over the past 200 years. Oxygen is commonly prescribed and administered as a therapy across all healthcare settings, particularly for the treatment and management of respiratory conditions, both acute and chronic. Yet despite its widespread use and recent advances in understanding and guidance, poor practice and controversies regarding its use persist. This historical analysis highlights origins in practice that may suggest where the roots of these fallacies lie, highlighting potential ambiguities and myths that have permeated clinical and social contexts. It can be considered that based on clinical presumptions and speculation the prolific and injudicious use of oxygen was encouraged and the legacy for today's practice seeded. The conjectures proposed here may enable modern day erroneous beliefs to be confronted and clinical practice to move on. © 2014, SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-199
Number of pages9
JournalTherapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease
Issue number6
Early online date9 Sept 2014
Publication statusPublished - 2014


  • history
  • oxygen
  • pre-hospital care
  • respiratory medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Oxygen therapy: time to move on?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this