Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

OVPSYCH2: A randomized controlled trial of psychological support versus standard of care following chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

  • E. Frangou
  • , G. Bertelli
  • , S. Love
  • , M. J. Mackean
  • , R. M. Glasspool
  • , C. Fotopoulou
  • , A. Cook
  • , S. Nicum
  • , R. Lord
  • , M. Ferguson
  • , R. L. Roux
  • , M. Martinez
  • , C. Butcher
  • , N. Hulbert-Williams
  • , L. Howells
  • , S. P. Blagden*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Oxford
  • Medical Research Council
  • Sussex Cancer Centre
  • Edinburgh Cancer Centre Western General Hospital
  • Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
  • Hammersmith Hospital
  • Cheltenham College
  • Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust
  • Ninewells Hospital
  • University of Chester
  • Maggie's Cancer Centres

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

Abstract

Background: Fear of disease progression (FOP) is a rational concern for women with Ovarian Cancer (OC) and depression is also common. To date there have been no randomized trials assessing the impact of psychological intervention on depression and FOP in this patient group. Patients and methods: Patients with primary or recurrent OC who had recently completed chemotherapy were eligible if they scored between 5 and 19 on the PHQ-9 depression and were randomized 1:1 to Intervention (3 standardized CBT-based sessions in the 6–12 weeks post-chemotherapy) or Control (standard of care). PHQ-9, FOP-Q-SF, EORTC QLQ C30 and OV28 questionnaires were then completed every 3 months for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was change in PHQ-9 at 3 months. Secondary endpoints were change in other scores at 3 months and all scores at later timepoints. Results: 182 patients registered; 107 were randomized; 54 to Intervention and 53 to Control; mean age 59 years; 75 (70%) had completed chemotherapy for primary and 32 (30%) for relapsed OC and 67 patients completed both baseline and 3-month questionnaires. Improvement in PHQ-9 was observed for patients in both study arms at three months compared to baseline but there was no significant difference in change between Intervention and Control. A significant improvement on FOP-Q-SF scores was seen in the Intervention arm, whereas for those in the Control arm FOP-Q-SF scores deteriorated at 3 months (intervention effect = −4.4 (−7.57, −1.22), p-value = 0.008). Conclusions: CBT-based psychological support provided after chemotherapy did not significantly alter the spontaneously improving trajectory of depression scores at three months but caused a significant improvement in FOP. Our findings call for the routine implementation of FOP support for ovarian cancer patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)431-439
Number of pages9
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume162
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Clinical trial
  • Fear of progression
  • Fear of relapse
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Quality of life
  • Depression/diagnosis
  • Prospective Studies
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Standard of Care
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Disease Progression
  • Fear/psychology
  • Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Pilot Projects
  • Patient Health Questionnaire/statistics & numerical data
  • Quality of Life
  • Female
  • Aged
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'OVPSYCH2: A randomized controlled trial of psychological support versus standard of care following chemotherapy for ovarian cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this