TY - JOUR
T1 - Operational Definitions related to Pediatric Ventilator Liberation
AU - Abu-Sultaneh, Samer
AU - Iyer, Narayan Prabhu
AU - Fernández, Analía
AU - Gaies, Michael
AU - González-Dambrauskas, Sebastián
AU - Hotz, Justin Christian
AU - Kneyber, Martin C.J.
AU - López-Fernández, Yolanda M.
AU - Rotta, Alexandre T.
AU - Werho, David K.
AU - Baranwal, Arun Kumar
AU - Blackwood, Bronagh
AU - Craven, Hannah J.
AU - Curley, Martha A.Q.
AU - Essouri, Sandrine
AU - Fioretto, Jose Roberto
AU - Hartmann, Silvia M.M.
AU - Jouvet, Philippe
AU - Korang, Steven Kwasi
AU - Rafferty, Gerrard F.
AU - Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan
AU - Rose, Louise
AU - Tume, Lyvonne N.
AU - Whipple, Elizabeth C.
AU - Wong, Judith Ju Ming
AU - Emeriaud, Guillaume
AU - Mastropietro, Christopher W.
AU - Napolitano, Natalie
AU - Newth, Christopher J.L.
AU - Khemani, Robinder G.
AU - the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Background
Common, operational definitions are crucial to assess interventions and outcomes related to pediatric mechanical ventilation. These definitions can reduce unnecessary variability amongst research and quality improvement efforts, to ensure findings are generalizable and can be pooled to establish best practices.
Research Question
Can we establish operational definitions for key elements related to pediatric ventilator liberation using a combination of detailed literature review and consensus-based approaches?
Study Design and Methods
A panel of 26 international experts in pediatric ventilator liberation, two methodologists and two librarians conducted systematic reviews on eight topic areas related to pediatric ventilator liberation. Through a series of virtual meetings, we established draft definitions which were voted upon using an anonymous web-based process. Definitions were revised by incorporating extracted data gathered during the systematic review and discussed in another consensus meeting. A second round of voting was conducted to confirm the final definitions.
Results
In eight topic areas identified by the experts, 16 preliminary definitions were established. Based on initial discussion and the first round of voting, modifications were suggested for 11 of the 16 definitions. There was significant variability in how these items were defined in the literature reviewed. The final round of voting achieved ≥80% agreement for all 16 definitions in the following areas: what constitutes respiratory support (invasive mechanical ventilation and non-invasive respiratory support), liberation and failed attempts to liberate from invasive mechanical ventilation, liberation from respiratory support, duration of non-invasive respiratory support, total duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, spontaneous breathing trials, extubation readiness testing, 28-ventilator free days, and planned vs rescue use of post-extubation non-invasive respiratory support.
Interpretation
We propose these consensus-based definitions for elements of pediatric ventilator liberation, informed by evidence, be used for future quality improvement initiatives and research studies to improve generalizability, and facilitate comparison.
AB - Background
Common, operational definitions are crucial to assess interventions and outcomes related to pediatric mechanical ventilation. These definitions can reduce unnecessary variability amongst research and quality improvement efforts, to ensure findings are generalizable and can be pooled to establish best practices.
Research Question
Can we establish operational definitions for key elements related to pediatric ventilator liberation using a combination of detailed literature review and consensus-based approaches?
Study Design and Methods
A panel of 26 international experts in pediatric ventilator liberation, two methodologists and two librarians conducted systematic reviews on eight topic areas related to pediatric ventilator liberation. Through a series of virtual meetings, we established draft definitions which were voted upon using an anonymous web-based process. Definitions were revised by incorporating extracted data gathered during the systematic review and discussed in another consensus meeting. A second round of voting was conducted to confirm the final definitions.
Results
In eight topic areas identified by the experts, 16 preliminary definitions were established. Based on initial discussion and the first round of voting, modifications were suggested for 11 of the 16 definitions. There was significant variability in how these items were defined in the literature reviewed. The final round of voting achieved ≥80% agreement for all 16 definitions in the following areas: what constitutes respiratory support (invasive mechanical ventilation and non-invasive respiratory support), liberation and failed attempts to liberate from invasive mechanical ventilation, liberation from respiratory support, duration of non-invasive respiratory support, total duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, spontaneous breathing trials, extubation readiness testing, 28-ventilator free days, and planned vs rescue use of post-extubation non-invasive respiratory support.
Interpretation
We propose these consensus-based definitions for elements of pediatric ventilator liberation, informed by evidence, be used for future quality improvement initiatives and research studies to improve generalizability, and facilitate comparison.
KW - Airway extubation
KW - Extubation failure
KW - High flow nasal cannula
KW - Mechanical ventilation
KW - Noninvasive ventilation
KW - Pediatric intensive care units
KW - Ventilator weaning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152244985&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85152244985&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chest.2022.12.010
DO - 10.1016/j.chest.2022.12.010
M3 - Article (journal)
C2 - 36563873
SN - 0012-3692
VL - 163
SP - 1130
EP - 1143
JO - Chest
JF - Chest
IS - 5
ER -