Open Dialogue peer review:
A response to Elliott

Victor Van Daal

Open Dialogue peer review: A response to Elliott

Victor Van Daal

Primary & Childhood Education

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (journal) › peer-review

108 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The author presents his thoughts on the theories presented in the book "The Dyslexia Debate" by Julian Elliott and Elena Grigorenko regarding the definition, measuring, and significance of reading disabilities regarding dyslexia. He comments on the common misconceptions regarding the condition outlined by Elliott and goes on to discuss why reading fluency and ability should be emphasized in dyslexia research.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	22-25
Journal	The Psychology of Education Review
Volume	39
Issue number	1
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 1 Mar 2015

Access to Document

Reply to Elliott (VvD).docxAccepted author manuscript, 105 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

http://edgehill.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=101171472&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Cite this

@article{9401f6fc012a4c70b1c8ebaed09c91c2,

title = "Open Dialogue peer review: A response to Elliott",

abstract = "The author presents his thoughts on the theories presented in the book {"}The Dyslexia Debate{"} by Julian Elliott and Elena Grigorenko regarding the definition, measuring, and significance of reading disabilities regarding dyslexia. He comments on the common misconceptions regarding the condition outlined by Elliott and goes on to discuss why reading fluency and ability should be emphasized in dyslexia research.",

author = "{Van Daal}, Victor",

year = "2015",

month = mar,

day = "1",

language = "English",

volume = "39",

pages = "22--25",

journal = "The Psychology of Education Review",

issn = "1463-9807",

publisher = "British Psychological Society",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Open Dialogue peer review: A response to Elliott

AU - Van Daal, Victor

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - The author presents his thoughts on the theories presented in the book "The Dyslexia Debate" by Julian Elliott and Elena Grigorenko regarding the definition, measuring, and significance of reading disabilities regarding dyslexia. He comments on the common misconceptions regarding the condition outlined by Elliott and goes on to discuss why reading fluency and ability should be emphasized in dyslexia research.

AB - The author presents his thoughts on the theories presented in the book "The Dyslexia Debate" by Julian Elliott and Elena Grigorenko regarding the definition, measuring, and significance of reading disabilities regarding dyslexia. He comments on the common misconceptions regarding the condition outlined by Elliott and goes on to discuss why reading fluency and ability should be emphasized in dyslexia research.

M3 - Article (journal)

SN - 1463-9807

VL - 39

SP - 22

EP - 25

JO - The Psychology of Education Review

JF - The Psychology of Education Review

IS - 1

ER -

Open Dialogue peer review: A response to Elliott

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this