Muslim Children’s Rights in a Cold Climate? Problematising the Recruitment of Schools in the ‘War on Terror’ in the UK

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

In the post-9/11 era many European countries widened their counter-terrorist policing strategies to include ‘counter-radicalisation’ policies aimed at the prevention of violent extremism. The UK Government ‘Prevent’ programme is one of the most systematic and elaborate examples of this to date. ‘Prevent’ selectively directs resources at local organisations to undertake ‘community development’ and ‘anti-radicalisation’ work and is premised on winning the ‘hearts and minds’ of young Muslims to unite around ‘shared British values’. The ‘Prevent’ budget in 2008/09 was £140 million (Kundnani, 2009). The UK Institute of Race Relations (2010) has expressed deep concern about the implications of ‘Prevent’ for the professional norms of teachers and youth and community workers many of whom have reported being pressured to ‘share information’, effectively colluding with the ‘mapping’ and surveillance of Muslim children and young people. This paper is derived within an ongoing larger research project by the author investigating the impact of UK Government anti-terror / counter-insurgency law and policy on Muslim children and young people. The paper will focus on and problematise the recruitment of schools and teachers to assist in the ‘War on Terror’ in England. Specifically, it engages with structural issues of power, politics and the implications for Muslim children and young people’s rights of the implementation of one dimension of the UK Government ‘Prevent’ strategy – the introduction in October 2008 of Learning Together to be Safe: a toolkit to help schools contribute to the prevention of violent extremism (DCSF, 2008). This toolkit gives practical advice to schools on “equipping young people with the knowledge and skills to challenge extremism”. It instructs staff to monitor for ‘warning signs’ of extremism and gives guidance on detecting ‘trigger points’ (including support for “the Islamic political system”; “a focus on scripture as an exclusive moral source” and “literalism in the reading of Muslim texts”). It also advises the formation of “good links” with the police and other agencies to share information. While acknowledging the real and ongoing risk of terrorism in the UK, the paper will nevertheless challenge the legitimacy of such surveillance practices in the classroom. It will be argued that the content and use of this toolkit abuses the concept of ‘citizenship education’, reinforces Islamaphobia and undermines the spirit of the UNCRC (1989) in relation to the rights of Muslim children in the UK - specifically, • Article 13 – the child’s right to freedom of expression • Article 14 – the child’s right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion • Article 29 – the education of the child shall be directed to the development of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and for the principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations • Article 30 – the child’s right to learn and use the language and customs of their families, whether these are shared by the majority of the people in the country or not
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 14 Sep 2011
EventEuropean Educational Research Association (EERA) European Conference on Educational Research (ECER) - Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Duration: 13 Sep 201116 Sep 2011

Conference

ConferenceEuropean Educational Research Association (EERA) European Conference on Educational Research (ECER)
CountryGermany
CityBerlin
Period13/09/1116/09/11

Fingerprint

terrorism
Muslim
radicalism
climate
children's rights
school
radicalization
surveillance
freedom of conscience
power politics
religious freedom
government program
teacher
community development
charter
political system
respect
UNO
education
legitimacy

Cite this

Coppock, V. (2011). Muslim Children’s Rights in a Cold Climate? Problematising the Recruitment of Schools in the ‘War on Terror’ in the UK. Paper presented at European Educational Research Association (EERA) European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), Berlin, Germany.
Coppock, Vicki. / Muslim Children’s Rights in a Cold Climate? Problematising the Recruitment of Schools in the ‘War on Terror’ in the UK. Paper presented at European Educational Research Association (EERA) European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), Berlin, Germany.
@conference{302afcfc248b43269aca9ea0a382fac2,
title = "Muslim Children’s Rights in a Cold Climate? Problematising the Recruitment of Schools in the ‘War on Terror’ in the UK",
abstract = "In the post-9/11 era many European countries widened their counter-terrorist policing strategies to include ‘counter-radicalisation’ policies aimed at the prevention of violent extremism. The UK Government ‘Prevent’ programme is one of the most systematic and elaborate examples of this to date. ‘Prevent’ selectively directs resources at local organisations to undertake ‘community development’ and ‘anti-radicalisation’ work and is premised on winning the ‘hearts and minds’ of young Muslims to unite around ‘shared British values’. The ‘Prevent’ budget in 2008/09 was £140 million (Kundnani, 2009). The UK Institute of Race Relations (2010) has expressed deep concern about the implications of ‘Prevent’ for the professional norms of teachers and youth and community workers many of whom have reported being pressured to ‘share information’, effectively colluding with the ‘mapping’ and surveillance of Muslim children and young people. This paper is derived within an ongoing larger research project by the author investigating the impact of UK Government anti-terror / counter-insurgency law and policy on Muslim children and young people. The paper will focus on and problematise the recruitment of schools and teachers to assist in the ‘War on Terror’ in England. Specifically, it engages with structural issues of power, politics and the implications for Muslim children and young people’s rights of the implementation of one dimension of the UK Government ‘Prevent’ strategy – the introduction in October 2008 of Learning Together to be Safe: a toolkit to help schools contribute to the prevention of violent extremism (DCSF, 2008). This toolkit gives practical advice to schools on “equipping young people with the knowledge and skills to challenge extremism”. It instructs staff to monitor for ‘warning signs’ of extremism and gives guidance on detecting ‘trigger points’ (including support for “the Islamic political system”; “a focus on scripture as an exclusive moral source” and “literalism in the reading of Muslim texts”). It also advises the formation of “good links” with the police and other agencies to share information. While acknowledging the real and ongoing risk of terrorism in the UK, the paper will nevertheless challenge the legitimacy of such surveillance practices in the classroom. It will be argued that the content and use of this toolkit abuses the concept of ‘citizenship education’, reinforces Islamaphobia and undermines the spirit of the UNCRC (1989) in relation to the rights of Muslim children in the UK - specifically, • Article 13 – the child’s right to freedom of expression • Article 14 – the child’s right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion • Article 29 – the education of the child shall be directed to the development of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and for the principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations • Article 30 – the child’s right to learn and use the language and customs of their families, whether these are shared by the majority of the people in the country or not",
author = "Vicki Coppock",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "14",
language = "English",
note = "European Educational Research Association (EERA) European Conference on Educational Research (ECER) ; Conference date: 13-09-2011 Through 16-09-2011",

}

Coppock, V 2011, 'Muslim Children’s Rights in a Cold Climate? Problematising the Recruitment of Schools in the ‘War on Terror’ in the UK' Paper presented at European Educational Research Association (EERA) European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), Berlin, Germany, 13/09/11 - 16/09/11, .

Muslim Children’s Rights in a Cold Climate? Problematising the Recruitment of Schools in the ‘War on Terror’ in the UK. / Coppock, Vicki.

2011. Paper presented at European Educational Research Association (EERA) European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), Berlin, Germany.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Muslim Children’s Rights in a Cold Climate? Problematising the Recruitment of Schools in the ‘War on Terror’ in the UK

AU - Coppock, Vicki

PY - 2011/9/14

Y1 - 2011/9/14

N2 - In the post-9/11 era many European countries widened their counter-terrorist policing strategies to include ‘counter-radicalisation’ policies aimed at the prevention of violent extremism. The UK Government ‘Prevent’ programme is one of the most systematic and elaborate examples of this to date. ‘Prevent’ selectively directs resources at local organisations to undertake ‘community development’ and ‘anti-radicalisation’ work and is premised on winning the ‘hearts and minds’ of young Muslims to unite around ‘shared British values’. The ‘Prevent’ budget in 2008/09 was £140 million (Kundnani, 2009). The UK Institute of Race Relations (2010) has expressed deep concern about the implications of ‘Prevent’ for the professional norms of teachers and youth and community workers many of whom have reported being pressured to ‘share information’, effectively colluding with the ‘mapping’ and surveillance of Muslim children and young people. This paper is derived within an ongoing larger research project by the author investigating the impact of UK Government anti-terror / counter-insurgency law and policy on Muslim children and young people. The paper will focus on and problematise the recruitment of schools and teachers to assist in the ‘War on Terror’ in England. Specifically, it engages with structural issues of power, politics and the implications for Muslim children and young people’s rights of the implementation of one dimension of the UK Government ‘Prevent’ strategy – the introduction in October 2008 of Learning Together to be Safe: a toolkit to help schools contribute to the prevention of violent extremism (DCSF, 2008). This toolkit gives practical advice to schools on “equipping young people with the knowledge and skills to challenge extremism”. It instructs staff to monitor for ‘warning signs’ of extremism and gives guidance on detecting ‘trigger points’ (including support for “the Islamic political system”; “a focus on scripture as an exclusive moral source” and “literalism in the reading of Muslim texts”). It also advises the formation of “good links” with the police and other agencies to share information. While acknowledging the real and ongoing risk of terrorism in the UK, the paper will nevertheless challenge the legitimacy of such surveillance practices in the classroom. It will be argued that the content and use of this toolkit abuses the concept of ‘citizenship education’, reinforces Islamaphobia and undermines the spirit of the UNCRC (1989) in relation to the rights of Muslim children in the UK - specifically, • Article 13 – the child’s right to freedom of expression • Article 14 – the child’s right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion • Article 29 – the education of the child shall be directed to the development of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and for the principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations • Article 30 – the child’s right to learn and use the language and customs of their families, whether these are shared by the majority of the people in the country or not

AB - In the post-9/11 era many European countries widened their counter-terrorist policing strategies to include ‘counter-radicalisation’ policies aimed at the prevention of violent extremism. The UK Government ‘Prevent’ programme is one of the most systematic and elaborate examples of this to date. ‘Prevent’ selectively directs resources at local organisations to undertake ‘community development’ and ‘anti-radicalisation’ work and is premised on winning the ‘hearts and minds’ of young Muslims to unite around ‘shared British values’. The ‘Prevent’ budget in 2008/09 was £140 million (Kundnani, 2009). The UK Institute of Race Relations (2010) has expressed deep concern about the implications of ‘Prevent’ for the professional norms of teachers and youth and community workers many of whom have reported being pressured to ‘share information’, effectively colluding with the ‘mapping’ and surveillance of Muslim children and young people. This paper is derived within an ongoing larger research project by the author investigating the impact of UK Government anti-terror / counter-insurgency law and policy on Muslim children and young people. The paper will focus on and problematise the recruitment of schools and teachers to assist in the ‘War on Terror’ in England. Specifically, it engages with structural issues of power, politics and the implications for Muslim children and young people’s rights of the implementation of one dimension of the UK Government ‘Prevent’ strategy – the introduction in October 2008 of Learning Together to be Safe: a toolkit to help schools contribute to the prevention of violent extremism (DCSF, 2008). This toolkit gives practical advice to schools on “equipping young people with the knowledge and skills to challenge extremism”. It instructs staff to monitor for ‘warning signs’ of extremism and gives guidance on detecting ‘trigger points’ (including support for “the Islamic political system”; “a focus on scripture as an exclusive moral source” and “literalism in the reading of Muslim texts”). It also advises the formation of “good links” with the police and other agencies to share information. While acknowledging the real and ongoing risk of terrorism in the UK, the paper will nevertheless challenge the legitimacy of such surveillance practices in the classroom. It will be argued that the content and use of this toolkit abuses the concept of ‘citizenship education’, reinforces Islamaphobia and undermines the spirit of the UNCRC (1989) in relation to the rights of Muslim children in the UK - specifically, • Article 13 – the child’s right to freedom of expression • Article 14 – the child’s right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion • Article 29 – the education of the child shall be directed to the development of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and for the principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations • Article 30 – the child’s right to learn and use the language and customs of their families, whether these are shared by the majority of the people in the country or not

UR - http://www.eera-ecer.de/ecer2011/

M3 - Paper

ER -

Coppock V. Muslim Children’s Rights in a Cold Climate? Problematising the Recruitment of Schools in the ‘War on Terror’ in the UK. 2011. Paper presented at European Educational Research Association (EERA) European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), Berlin, Germany.