Abstract
Our earlier research demonstrated that participation in four sessions of motivational interviewing (MI) early post-stroke has a positive impact on stroke survivors’ mood. However, the theoretical underpinnings of MI in supporting adjustment (rather than its traditional use in supporting behavior change) require clarification. This article describes a content analysis of MI transcripts for 10 participants in our previous study, to identify the focus of discussions (patient “concerns”) and potential effective components of our MI approach. Patients’ post-stroke concerns were shown in 16 categories, including frustration, family impact, and getting well. There was a pattern of change discourse across sessions: “Sustain talk” (reasons for not changing) reduced from Session 1 onward, “change talk” (intent to change) increased then reduced, and “change expressed” (changes achieved) increased from Sessions 1 to 4. MI facilitates healthy adjustment post-stroke in some patients, in turn affecting mood, but clarification of how this effect is achieved requires further exploration.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 264-272 |
Journal | Qualitative Health Research |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 22 Apr 2015 |
Keywords
- content analysis
- depression
- psychosocial issues
- qualitative analysis
- self-efficacy
- stroke
- theory development