Measuring world governance: revisiting the institutions hypothesis

Research output: Contribution to conferenceLecture

Abstract

We consider the weighting scheme that results in a best-case scenario in the construction of the World Governance Indicators (WGI), a proxy of institutional quality. To do that we use an approach that relies on consistent tests for stochastic dominance efficiency of a given index with respect to all possible indices constructed from a set of individual components. The test statistics and the estimators are computed using mixed integer programming methods. The results show that the equally-weighted (fixed weights) composite WGI index is not the best-case scenario and that governance indicators at different years should be weighted differently. Furthermore, we revisit the institutions hypothesis in the empirical growth literature, where institutional quality is the main determinant of long term development. We find that not only institutions matter for economic development, but also geography and macroeconomic policies do affect economic development directly.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2013
EventManagement Control Association (MCA) Workshop - Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
Duration: 15 Feb 2013 → …

Workshop

WorkshopManagement Control Association (MCA) Workshop
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityOrmskirk
Period15/02/13 → …

Fingerprint

Governance
Economic development
Institutional quality
Scenarios
Consistent test
Test statistic
Stochastic dominance
Macroeconomic policy
Geography
Mixed integer programming
Estimator
Weighting

Cite this

Pinar, M. (2013). Measuring world governance: revisiting the institutions hypothesis. Management Control Association (MCA) Workshop, Ormskirk, United Kingdom.
Pinar, Mehmet. / Measuring world governance: revisiting the institutions hypothesis. Management Control Association (MCA) Workshop, Ormskirk, United Kingdom.
@conference{8ec5daaa1686410d86986e1518410a81,
title = "Measuring world governance: revisiting the institutions hypothesis",
abstract = "We consider the weighting scheme that results in a best-case scenario in the construction of the World Governance Indicators (WGI), a proxy of institutional quality. To do that we use an approach that relies on consistent tests for stochastic dominance efficiency of a given index with respect to all possible indices constructed from a set of individual components. The test statistics and the estimators are computed using mixed integer programming methods. The results show that the equally-weighted (fixed weights) composite WGI index is not the best-case scenario and that governance indicators at different years should be weighted differently. Furthermore, we revisit the institutions hypothesis in the empirical growth literature, where institutional quality is the main determinant of long term development. We find that not only institutions matter for economic development, but also geography and macroeconomic policies do affect economic development directly.",
author = "Mehmet Pinar",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
note = "Management Control Association (MCA) Workshop ; Conference date: 15-02-2013",

}

Pinar, M 2013, 'Measuring world governance: revisiting the institutions hypothesis' Management Control Association (MCA) Workshop, Ormskirk, United Kingdom, 15/02/13, .

Measuring world governance: revisiting the institutions hypothesis. / Pinar, Mehmet.

2013. Management Control Association (MCA) Workshop, Ormskirk, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceLecture

TY - CONF

T1 - Measuring world governance: revisiting the institutions hypothesis

AU - Pinar, Mehmet

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - We consider the weighting scheme that results in a best-case scenario in the construction of the World Governance Indicators (WGI), a proxy of institutional quality. To do that we use an approach that relies on consistent tests for stochastic dominance efficiency of a given index with respect to all possible indices constructed from a set of individual components. The test statistics and the estimators are computed using mixed integer programming methods. The results show that the equally-weighted (fixed weights) composite WGI index is not the best-case scenario and that governance indicators at different years should be weighted differently. Furthermore, we revisit the institutions hypothesis in the empirical growth literature, where institutional quality is the main determinant of long term development. We find that not only institutions matter for economic development, but also geography and macroeconomic policies do affect economic development directly.

AB - We consider the weighting scheme that results in a best-case scenario in the construction of the World Governance Indicators (WGI), a proxy of institutional quality. To do that we use an approach that relies on consistent tests for stochastic dominance efficiency of a given index with respect to all possible indices constructed from a set of individual components. The test statistics and the estimators are computed using mixed integer programming methods. The results show that the equally-weighted (fixed weights) composite WGI index is not the best-case scenario and that governance indicators at different years should be weighted differently. Furthermore, we revisit the institutions hypothesis in the empirical growth literature, where institutional quality is the main determinant of long term development. We find that not only institutions matter for economic development, but also geography and macroeconomic policies do affect economic development directly.

UR - http://www.edgehill.ac.uk/events/2013/02/15/management-control-association-mca-workshop

M3 - Lecture

ER -

Pinar M. Measuring world governance: revisiting the institutions hypothesis. 2013. Management Control Association (MCA) Workshop, Ormskirk, United Kingdom.