Abstract
The UK ‘New’ Labour Government has introduced a number of regional, local and neighbourhood initiatives. These claim to share similar characteristics based upon the concepts of ‘partnership’ and ‘multi-agency’ cooperation. New structures to ensure the accountability and the delivery of these ÔnewÕ forms of governance and service delivery have been established. Local Strategic Partnerships, with an emphasis on community ‘capacity’ building are the latest policy response. This paper, drawing upon research in Manchester and Glasgow, suggests that whilst these initiatives use a new language, they are steeped in old practices. Changing structures does not, of itself, alter the power differences inherent in local neighbourhoods where community groups are cast as ‘dependent’ by regeneration managers seeking to meet performance targets. The paper seeks to identify ways in which this relationship can be altered to enable local groups to negotiate a new agenda.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 177-189 |
| Journal | Community Development Journal |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2004 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Local regeneration initiatives and capacity building: Whose ‘capacity’ and ‘building’ for what?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver