Understanding people’s lives, emotions and intellectual reasoning is crucial to exploring the history of communities and identities. ‘The co-production of historical knowledge’ provides an approach or methodology that allows for a deeper comprehension of people’s self and community identities by encouraging a diverse range of people to participate in the research process to uncover the complexities and nuances of historical experience. Yet as Steven High has argued, ‘there has been remarkably little discussion of the public’s place in the research process: how, when, and if authority should be shared between university based researchers and community members.’ This chapter argues that ‘sharing authority’ needs to be expanded beyond oral history, in which participants contribute to the creation of primary sources, to a sustained and collaborative effort to develop new ways of knowing about the past by drawing on perspectives outside of universities to produce new knowledge. A blurring of the boundaries between academic historians and communities in exploring history enables multiple voices to be heard in the historiographical record.
|Title of host publication||History Making a Difference: New Approaches from Aotearoa|
|Editors||Lyndon Fraser, Marguerite Hill, Sarah Murray, Greg Ryan|
|Place of Publication||Newcastle|
|Publisher||History Making a Difference: New Approaches from Aotearoa|
|Number of pages||290|
|Publication status||Published - 1 Apr 2017|
- historical methodologies
Ward, P., & Pente, E. (2017). Let's change History! Community histories and the co-production of historical knowledge. In L. Fraser, M. Hill, S. Murray, & G. Ryan (Eds.), History Making a Difference: New Approaches from Aotearoa (pp. 94-112). History Making a Difference: New Approaches from Aotearoa.