Learning in Online Continuing Professional Development: An Institutionalist View on the Personal Learning Environment

MW Johnson, D Prescott, Sarah Lyon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The nature of institutions is an important question for the Personal Learning Environment (PLE). Whilst the PLE has tended to focus on what is considered to be “non-institutional” technology like social software, most online tools today have a corporate/institutional foundation. How should educators position themselves with learners who have to negotiate different institutional and discursive contexts – whether within corporate social software, formal education, work or the family? Drawing on previous work focusing on how learners maintain personal coherence in organising learning between different contexts, institutional theory is used to revise the model of the learner as a ‘viable system’, which focuses on the dynamics of transactions that learners make with different institutional entities. Data from an online Continuing Professional Development (CPD) course in acute cancer care is analysed to show how learner transactions indicate constraints bearing upon learners both from their professional context and from their formal educational study. The pattern of learner engagement suggests that the interaction of constraints creates the conditions to motivate in-depth contribution to the course forums. This finding leads us to suggest a rethink of pedagogy within the PLE, and a broader consideration of institutional and other constraints in educational dynamics
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-27
JournalJournal of New Approaches in Educational Research
Volume6
Issue number1
Early online date15 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Jul 2016

Fingerprint

learning environment
learning
cancer
educator
interaction
education
software

Keywords

  • Personal Learning Environment
  • Constraint
  • Viable System Model
  • Transaction
  • New Institutionalism

Cite this

@article{bd09e16227c8428da1762face67a6e09,
title = "Learning in Online Continuing Professional Development: An Institutionalist View on the Personal Learning Environment",
abstract = "The nature of institutions is an important question for the Personal Learning Environment (PLE). Whilst the PLE has tended to focus on what is considered to be “non-institutional” technology like social software, most online tools today have a corporate/institutional foundation. How should educators position themselves with learners who have to negotiate different institutional and discursive contexts – whether within corporate social software, formal education, work or the family? Drawing on previous work focusing on how learners maintain personal coherence in organising learning between different contexts, institutional theory is used to revise the model of the learner as a ‘viable system’, which focuses on the dynamics of transactions that learners make with different institutional entities. Data from an online Continuing Professional Development (CPD) course in acute cancer care is analysed to show how learner transactions indicate constraints bearing upon learners both from their professional context and from their formal educational study. The pattern of learner engagement suggests that the interaction of constraints creates the conditions to motivate in-depth contribution to the course forums. This finding leads us to suggest a rethink of pedagogy within the PLE, and a broader consideration of institutional and other constraints in educational dynamics",
keywords = "Personal Learning Environment, Constraint, Viable System Model, Transaction, New Institutionalism",
author = "MW Johnson and D Prescott and Sarah Lyon",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.7821/naer.2017.1.189",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "20--27",
journal = "Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research",
issn = "2254-7339",
publisher = "University of Alicante",
number = "1",

}

Learning in Online Continuing Professional Development: An Institutionalist View on the Personal Learning Environment. / Johnson, MW; Prescott, D; Lyon, Sarah.

In: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 15.07.2016, p. 20-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning in Online Continuing Professional Development: An Institutionalist View on the Personal Learning Environment

AU - Johnson, MW

AU - Prescott, D

AU - Lyon, Sarah

PY - 2016/7/15

Y1 - 2016/7/15

N2 - The nature of institutions is an important question for the Personal Learning Environment (PLE). Whilst the PLE has tended to focus on what is considered to be “non-institutional” technology like social software, most online tools today have a corporate/institutional foundation. How should educators position themselves with learners who have to negotiate different institutional and discursive contexts – whether within corporate social software, formal education, work or the family? Drawing on previous work focusing on how learners maintain personal coherence in organising learning between different contexts, institutional theory is used to revise the model of the learner as a ‘viable system’, which focuses on the dynamics of transactions that learners make with different institutional entities. Data from an online Continuing Professional Development (CPD) course in acute cancer care is analysed to show how learner transactions indicate constraints bearing upon learners both from their professional context and from their formal educational study. The pattern of learner engagement suggests that the interaction of constraints creates the conditions to motivate in-depth contribution to the course forums. This finding leads us to suggest a rethink of pedagogy within the PLE, and a broader consideration of institutional and other constraints in educational dynamics

AB - The nature of institutions is an important question for the Personal Learning Environment (PLE). Whilst the PLE has tended to focus on what is considered to be “non-institutional” technology like social software, most online tools today have a corporate/institutional foundation. How should educators position themselves with learners who have to negotiate different institutional and discursive contexts – whether within corporate social software, formal education, work or the family? Drawing on previous work focusing on how learners maintain personal coherence in organising learning between different contexts, institutional theory is used to revise the model of the learner as a ‘viable system’, which focuses on the dynamics of transactions that learners make with different institutional entities. Data from an online Continuing Professional Development (CPD) course in acute cancer care is analysed to show how learner transactions indicate constraints bearing upon learners both from their professional context and from their formal educational study. The pattern of learner engagement suggests that the interaction of constraints creates the conditions to motivate in-depth contribution to the course forums. This finding leads us to suggest a rethink of pedagogy within the PLE, and a broader consideration of institutional and other constraints in educational dynamics

KW - Personal Learning Environment

KW - Constraint

KW - Viable System Model

KW - Transaction

KW - New Institutionalism

U2 - 10.7821/naer.2017.1.189

DO - 10.7821/naer.2017.1.189

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 20

EP - 27

JO - Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

JF - Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

SN - 2254-7339

IS - 1

ER -