TY - JOUR
T1 - Is the taxonomy of Brachycephalus (Anura
T2 - Brachycephalidae) in need of rescue? A reply to Condez et al. (2017)
AU - Pie, Marcio R.
AU - Ribeiro, Luiz F.
AU - Bornschein, Marcos R.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge the continued funding by the Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza (grants 0895_20111 and A0010_2014). MRP is funded by CNPq (301636/2016-8). Jose M. Padial, Marcelo Gehara and Carla S. Guimarães provided valuable suggestions on the manuscript.
PY - 2017/11/20
Y1 - 2017/11/20
N2 - Brachycephalus is a fascinating genus of miniaturized frogs endemic to the Brazilian Atlantic Forest (Bornschein et al. 2016a). Given the many new species that have been recently discovered (20 species over the past 10 years [Frost 2017]) and their often microendemic distribution (see Bornschein et al. 2016a), there has been an increasing awareness about the need for more extensive field work to locate additional new species, to describe their geographical distributions, and to devise comprehensive efforts to ensure their conservation. In a recent correspondence in Zootaxa, Condez et al. (2017) singled out nine of those new species that have been described by our research group (Ribeiro et al. 2015; Pie & Ribeiro 2015; Bornschein et al. 2016b); two additional species (Ribeiro et al. 2017) were described after their paper was published. According to Condez et al. (2017), our species descriptions included “inadequate diagnoses, which lacked indispensable information for any further comparisons among species” (p. 395). Herein, we explore the extent to which their arguments would undermine the validity of those species.
AB - Brachycephalus is a fascinating genus of miniaturized frogs endemic to the Brazilian Atlantic Forest (Bornschein et al. 2016a). Given the many new species that have been recently discovered (20 species over the past 10 years [Frost 2017]) and their often microendemic distribution (see Bornschein et al. 2016a), there has been an increasing awareness about the need for more extensive field work to locate additional new species, to describe their geographical distributions, and to devise comprehensive efforts to ensure their conservation. In a recent correspondence in Zootaxa, Condez et al. (2017) singled out nine of those new species that have been described by our research group (Ribeiro et al. 2015; Pie & Ribeiro 2015; Bornschein et al. 2016b); two additional species (Ribeiro et al. 2017) were described after their paper was published. According to Condez et al. (2017), our species descriptions included “inadequate diagnoses, which lacked indispensable information for any further comparisons among species” (p. 395). Herein, we explore the extent to which their arguments would undermine the validity of those species.
KW - Amphibia
KW - Anura
KW - Brachycephalidae
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035022774&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035022774&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.11646/zootaxa.4350.3.11
DO - 10.11646/zootaxa.4350.3.11
M3 - Letter
C2 - 29245546
AN - SCOPUS:85035022774
SN - 1175-5326
VL - 4350
SP - 587
EP - 589
JO - Zootaxa
JF - Zootaxa
IS - 3
ER -