Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Edge Hill University Home
Help & FAQ
Home
Profiles
Research units
Research output
Projects
Student theses
Activities
Prizes
Impacts
Equipment
Datasets
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Is bolus or continuous enteral feeding better in critically ill children: An evidence-based review
Hayley Littler
*
,
Lyvonne N. Tume
*
Corresponding author for this work
Nursing & Midwifery
Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust
University of Salford
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Review article
›
peer-review
7
Citations (Scopus)
36
Downloads (Pure)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is bolus or continuous enteral feeding better in critically ill children: An evidence-based review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Critically Ill children
100%
Evidence-based Review
100%
Bolus
100%
Continuous Enteral Feeding
100%
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
100%
Randomized Controlled Trial
50%
Impact on Patients
50%
Patient Outcomes
50%
Clinical Significance
50%
Enteral Feeding
50%
Conflicting Evidence
50%
Enteral nutrition
50%
Feeding Practices
50%
Inadequate nutrition
50%
Variable Practice
50%
Bolus Feeding
50%
Intermittent Feeding
50%
Mechanically Ventilated children
50%
Nursing and Health Professions
Enteric Feeding
100%
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
66%
Systematic Review
33%
Treatment Outcome
33%