Investigating the attentional demands of recognition memory: Manipulating depth of encoding at study and level of attention at test

Lauren Knott, S. A Dewhurst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the effects of divided attention at test after manipulating levels of processing at study. In Experiment 1 items were studied either intact or as anagrams. In Experiment 2 items were studied with either full or divided attention (DA). In both experiments participants carried out a recognition test with either full or divided attention. Analysis of remember and know responses revealed that DA at test had no effect on remember responses to anagrams or to items studied with full attention. In contrast, Know responses decreased with DA at test, and this occurred for items studied in both deep and shallow encoding conditions. The present study confirms recent findings (Knott & Dewhurst, 2007a) that knowing can rely on more controlled retrieval processes, whereas remembering can rely on more automatic retrieval processes. Differences in the controlled processes associated with recollection and familiarity and remember and know responses are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1045-1071
JournalEuropean Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Volume21
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Recognition (Psychology)

Cite this

@article{8bc754d3791f4df88eaac26895bb30dd,
title = "Investigating the attentional demands of recognition memory: Manipulating depth of encoding at study and level of attention at test",
abstract = "Two experiments investigated the effects of divided attention at test after manipulating levels of processing at study. In Experiment 1 items were studied either intact or as anagrams. In Experiment 2 items were studied with either full or divided attention (DA). In both experiments participants carried out a recognition test with either full or divided attention. Analysis of remember and know responses revealed that DA at test had no effect on remember responses to anagrams or to items studied with full attention. In contrast, Know responses decreased with DA at test, and this occurred for items studied in both deep and shallow encoding conditions. The present study confirms recent findings (Knott & Dewhurst, 2007a) that knowing can rely on more controlled retrieval processes, whereas remembering can rely on more automatic retrieval processes. Differences in the controlled processes associated with recollection and familiarity and remember and know responses are discussed.",
author = "Lauren Knott and Dewhurst, {S. A}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/09541440802539515",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "1045--1071",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "2044-5911",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "7",

}

Investigating the attentional demands of recognition memory: Manipulating depth of encoding at study and level of attention at test. / Knott, Lauren; Dewhurst, S. A.

In: European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 7, 2009, p. 1045-1071.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating the attentional demands of recognition memory: Manipulating depth of encoding at study and level of attention at test

AU - Knott, Lauren

AU - Dewhurst, S. A

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Two experiments investigated the effects of divided attention at test after manipulating levels of processing at study. In Experiment 1 items were studied either intact or as anagrams. In Experiment 2 items were studied with either full or divided attention (DA). In both experiments participants carried out a recognition test with either full or divided attention. Analysis of remember and know responses revealed that DA at test had no effect on remember responses to anagrams or to items studied with full attention. In contrast, Know responses decreased with DA at test, and this occurred for items studied in both deep and shallow encoding conditions. The present study confirms recent findings (Knott & Dewhurst, 2007a) that knowing can rely on more controlled retrieval processes, whereas remembering can rely on more automatic retrieval processes. Differences in the controlled processes associated with recollection and familiarity and remember and know responses are discussed.

AB - Two experiments investigated the effects of divided attention at test after manipulating levels of processing at study. In Experiment 1 items were studied either intact or as anagrams. In Experiment 2 items were studied with either full or divided attention (DA). In both experiments participants carried out a recognition test with either full or divided attention. Analysis of remember and know responses revealed that DA at test had no effect on remember responses to anagrams or to items studied with full attention. In contrast, Know responses decreased with DA at test, and this occurred for items studied in both deep and shallow encoding conditions. The present study confirms recent findings (Knott & Dewhurst, 2007a) that knowing can rely on more controlled retrieval processes, whereas remembering can rely on more automatic retrieval processes. Differences in the controlled processes associated with recollection and familiarity and remember and know responses are discussed.

U2 - 10.1080/09541440802539515

DO - 10.1080/09541440802539515

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 1045

EP - 1071

JO - Journal of Cognitive Psychology

JF - Journal of Cognitive Psychology

SN - 2044-5911

IS - 7

ER -