Abstract

Intravenous maintenance fluid therapy (IV-MFT) is one of the most prescribed, yet one of the least studied, interventions in paediatric acute and critical care settings. IV-MFT is not typically treated in the same way as drugs with specific indications, contraindications, compositions, and associated adverse effects. In the last decade, societies in both paediatric and adult medicine have issued evidence-based practice guidelines for the use of intravenous fluids in clinical practice. The main objective of this Viewpoint is to summarise and compare the rationales on which these international expert guidelines were based and how these recommendations affect IV-MFT practices in paediatric acute and critical care. Although these guidelines recommend the use of isotonic fluids as a standard in IV-MFT, some discrepancies and uncertainties remain regarding the systematic use of balanced fluids, glucose and electrolyte requirements, and appropriate fluid volume. IV-MFT should be considered in the same way as any other prescription drug and none of the components of IV-MFT prescription should be overlooked (ie, choice of drug, dosing rate, duration of treatment, and de-escalation). Furthermore, most evidence that was used to inform the guidelines comes from high-income countries. Although some principles of IV-MFT are universal, the direct relevance to and feasibility of implementing the guidelines in low-income and middle-income countries is uncertain. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.]
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)236-244
Number of pages9
JournalThe Lancet. Child & adolescent health
Volume8
Issue number3
Early online date12 Jan 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2024

Keywords

  • Child
  • Critical Care
  • Critical Illness/therapy
  • Fluid Therapy/adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Poverty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intravenous maintenance fluid therapy in acutely and critically ill children: state of the evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this