Interruptions in Political Interviews: A Reply to Bull and Mayer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper seeks to reopen the issue of whether Mrs Thatcher's interviews do show, as has been claimed, a distinctive pattern in that they are characterised by interviewers often gaining the floor through interruption at certain points in her speech because her turns appear to be complete at these points. Bull & Mayer (1988) have argued that earlier claims by Beattie (1982) and Beattie, Cutler & Pearson (1982) on this matter are suspect for a variety of methodological and statistical reasons. Each of their criticisms are addressed in this paper. It is argued that Bull & Mayer's study cannot be considered a direct test of the original hypothesis for a variety of reasons which are all outlined. The dialogue which is subsequently set up has implications far beyond the limited research question of the structure of Mrs Thatcher's political interviews and raises some compelling questions about the classification of all conversational turn-exchanges as well as the future development of schemes for classifying interruption.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-339
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Language and Social Psychology
Volume8
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1989

Keywords

  • Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Interruptions in Political Interviews: A Reply to Bull and Mayer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this