Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Internal fixation versus other surgical methods for treating distal radius fractures in adults

  • Arpit C. Jariwala
  • , Alistair R. Phillips
  • , Philip A. Storey
  • , David Nuttall
  • , Adam C. Watts*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Derriford Hospital
  • Northern General Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (journal) › peer-review

Abstract

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To compare the effects (benefits and harms) of internal fixation versus other methods of surgical intervention (percutaneous pinning; external fixation) for distal radius fractures in adults. Our main comparisons will be: internal fixation versus method of surgery that is not internal fixation; i.e. percutaneous pinning or external fixation or a combination of these two methods internal fixation versus percutaneous pinning internal fixation versus external fixation
Original languageEnglish
Article numberCD011212
JournalCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Volume2014
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jul 2014

Keywords

  • radial fractures
  • treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Internal fixation versus other surgical methods for treating distal radius fractures in adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this