TY - JOUR
T1 - Industry Concentration and The Cross-Section Of Stock Returns: Evidence From The UK
AU - Hashem, Nawar
AU - SU, LARRY
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VGTU) Press.
PY - 2015/7/4
Y1 - 2015/7/4
N2 - Abstract: In this paper, we examine the relationship between market structure and ex- pected stock returns in the London Stock Exchange during 1985 and 2010. Using Fama- MacBeth regressions, we find that industry concentration is negatively related to average stock returns, even after controlling for beta, size, book-to-market equity, momentum, and leverage. In addition, there is a strong evidence of a growth effect. Firms or industry portfolios with smaller book-to-market ratios have significantly higher returns. In contrast, beta is never statistically significant. The above results are robust to firm- and industry- level regressions, and the formation of firms into 100 size-beta portfolios. Our findings indicate that competitive industries earn, on average, higher risk-adjusted returns than concentrated industries. An explanation is that investors in more competitive industries require larger premiums for greater distress risks associated with these industries. Our paper is one of the first to link market competition with the average stock returns in the UK, and contributes to the asset pricing literature by extending the evidence from the US to another important financial market.
AB - Abstract: In this paper, we examine the relationship between market structure and ex- pected stock returns in the London Stock Exchange during 1985 and 2010. Using Fama- MacBeth regressions, we find that industry concentration is negatively related to average stock returns, even after controlling for beta, size, book-to-market equity, momentum, and leverage. In addition, there is a strong evidence of a growth effect. Firms or industry portfolios with smaller book-to-market ratios have significantly higher returns. In contrast, beta is never statistically significant. The above results are robust to firm- and industry- level regressions, and the formation of firms into 100 size-beta portfolios. Our findings indicate that competitive industries earn, on average, higher risk-adjusted returns than concentrated industries. An explanation is that investors in more competitive industries require larger premiums for greater distress risks associated with these industries. Our paper is one of the first to link market competition with the average stock returns in the UK, and contributes to the asset pricing literature by extending the evidence from the US to another important financial market.
KW - London stock exchange
KW - asset pricing
KW - distress risk
KW - industry concentration
KW - market structure
KW - stock returns
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2013.833547
U2 - 10.3846/16111699.2013.833547
DO - 10.3846/16111699.2013.833547
M3 - Article (journal)
SN - 1611-1699
VL - 16
SP - 769
EP - 785
JO - Journal of Business Economics and Management
JF - Journal of Business Economics and Management
IS - 4
ER -