Implementing a Systematic Voiding Program for Patients With Urinary Incontinence After Stroke

Beverley French, Louis H Thomas, Joanna Harrison, Christopher R Burton, Denise Forshaw, Joanne Booth, David Britt, Francine M Cheater, Brenda Roe, Caroline L Watkins

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)
    134 Downloads (Pure)


    We explored health professionals’ views of implementing a systematic voiding program (SVP) in a multi-site qualitative process evaluation in stroke services recruited to the intervention arms of a cluster randomized controlled feasibility trial during 2011-2013. We conducted semi-structured group or individual interviews with 38 purposively selected nursing, managerial, and care staff involved in delivering the SVP. Content analysis of transcripts used normalization process theory (NPT) as a pre-specified organization-level exploratory framework. Barriers to implementing the SVP included perceived lack of suitability for some patient groups, patient fear of extending hospital stay, and difficulties with SVP enactment, scheduling, timing, recording, and monitoring. Enablers included the guidance provided by the SVP, patient and relative involvement, extra staff, improved nursing skill and confidence, and experience of success. Three potential mechanisms of consistency, visibility, and individualization linked the SVP process with improvements in outcome, and should be emphasized in SVP implementation.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1393-1408
    JournalQualitative Health Research
    Issue number10
    Early online date1 Mar 2016
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2016


    Dive into the research topics of 'Implementing a Systematic Voiding Program for Patients With Urinary Incontinence After Stroke'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this