I'm Peppa Shit: Spokes-characters 2.0 as Bearers of Reputational Risk? The Case of Peppa Pig”.

Catherine Wilkinson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Spokes-characters have traditionally been presented in the literature as static entities, often likened to a trademark or logo, and discussed as a failsafe branding constituent. Meanwhile, celebrity spokespersons are presented as risk-bearing endorsers, due to the limited control brand managers have over their actions. However, with the rise of web 2.0 technologies, the new-fangled consumer-producer has the potential to rewrite the traditional handbook of spokes-character guidelines, presenting spokes-characters to be equally as erratic as their human counterparts. Studying an extension of consumer generated media, namely YouTube spoofs and parodies. This chapter aims to determine the impact of the controversial acts of spokes-character Peppa Pig on the brand’s reputation. To this end, this thesis is concerned with mapping consumer responses to parodies/spoofs, thereby exposing the potentially detrimental effects of unregulated consumer generated media. Using the single case study of Peppa Pig, a multimodal autonetnographic approach has been adopted whereby the researcher became a member of the YouTube community. The data were collected from auto-netnographic fieldnotes; comment threads; online in-depth interviews with creators of the controversial YouTube videos; online video elicitation interviews with consumers; and semi-structured face-to-face interviews with Peppa Pig licensing officials. The main conclusions drawn from this research were that the controversial acts of the spokes-character, via the YouTube spoofs/parodies, foster negative evaluations of the character. Yet, on the whole, this did not impact on consumers’ perception of the brand. Interestingly, threat to the brand’s reputation ensued from the company’s lack of regulation over the controversial content. As such, this research recommends that, in order to regain their brand management rights, and to safeguard against reputational damage, marketers must implement remedial measures, for instance the monitoring and filtering of consumer generated media.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMeaning and λόγος Proceedings from the Early Professional Interdisciplinary Conference
EditorsErica Hughes
PublisherCambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle Upon Tyne
Pages41-61
ISBN (Print)978-1-4438-6879-2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

satire
reputation
video
interview
trademark
VIP
producer
damages
manager
threat
monitoring
regulation
lack
evaluation
management
community

Cite this

Wilkinson, C. (2015). I'm Peppa Shit: Spokes-characters 2.0 as Bearers of Reputational Risk? The Case of Peppa Pig”. In E. Hughes (Ed.), Meaning and λόγος Proceedings from the Early Professional Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 41-61). Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle Upon Tyne.
Wilkinson, Catherine. / I'm Peppa Shit: Spokes-characters 2.0 as Bearers of Reputational Risk? The Case of Peppa Pig”. Meaning and λόγος Proceedings from the Early Professional Interdisciplinary Conference. editor / Erica Hughes. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle Upon Tyne, 2015. pp. 41-61
@inbook{b07d005ddada41e7a11cfc50360dcc84,
title = "I'm Peppa Shit: Spokes-characters 2.0 as Bearers of Reputational Risk? The Case of Peppa Pig”.",
abstract = "Spokes-characters have traditionally been presented in the literature as static entities, often likened to a trademark or logo, and discussed as a failsafe branding constituent. Meanwhile, celebrity spokespersons are presented as risk-bearing endorsers, due to the limited control brand managers have over their actions. However, with the rise of web 2.0 technologies, the new-fangled consumer-producer has the potential to rewrite the traditional handbook of spokes-character guidelines, presenting spokes-characters to be equally as erratic as their human counterparts. Studying an extension of consumer generated media, namely YouTube spoofs and parodies. This chapter aims to determine the impact of the controversial acts of spokes-character Peppa Pig on the brand’s reputation. To this end, this thesis is concerned with mapping consumer responses to parodies/spoofs, thereby exposing the potentially detrimental effects of unregulated consumer generated media. Using the single case study of Peppa Pig, a multimodal autonetnographic approach has been adopted whereby the researcher became a member of the YouTube community. The data were collected from auto-netnographic fieldnotes; comment threads; online in-depth interviews with creators of the controversial YouTube videos; online video elicitation interviews with consumers; and semi-structured face-to-face interviews with Peppa Pig licensing officials. The main conclusions drawn from this research were that the controversial acts of the spokes-character, via the YouTube spoofs/parodies, foster negative evaluations of the character. Yet, on the whole, this did not impact on consumers’ perception of the brand. Interestingly, threat to the brand’s reputation ensued from the company’s lack of regulation over the controversial content. As such, this research recommends that, in order to regain their brand management rights, and to safeguard against reputational damage, marketers must implement remedial measures, for instance the monitoring and filtering of consumer generated media.",
author = "Catherine Wilkinson",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-4438-6879-2",
pages = "41--61",
editor = "Erica Hughes",
booktitle = "Meaning and λόγος Proceedings from the Early Professional Interdisciplinary Conference",
publisher = "Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle Upon Tyne",

}

Wilkinson, C 2015, I'm Peppa Shit: Spokes-characters 2.0 as Bearers of Reputational Risk? The Case of Peppa Pig”. in E Hughes (ed.), Meaning and λόγος Proceedings from the Early Professional Interdisciplinary Conference. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle Upon Tyne, pp. 41-61.

I'm Peppa Shit: Spokes-characters 2.0 as Bearers of Reputational Risk? The Case of Peppa Pig”. / Wilkinson, Catherine.

Meaning and λόγος Proceedings from the Early Professional Interdisciplinary Conference. ed. / Erica Hughes. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle Upon Tyne, 2015. p. 41-61.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - I'm Peppa Shit: Spokes-characters 2.0 as Bearers of Reputational Risk? The Case of Peppa Pig”.

AU - Wilkinson, Catherine

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Spokes-characters have traditionally been presented in the literature as static entities, often likened to a trademark or logo, and discussed as a failsafe branding constituent. Meanwhile, celebrity spokespersons are presented as risk-bearing endorsers, due to the limited control brand managers have over their actions. However, with the rise of web 2.0 technologies, the new-fangled consumer-producer has the potential to rewrite the traditional handbook of spokes-character guidelines, presenting spokes-characters to be equally as erratic as their human counterparts. Studying an extension of consumer generated media, namely YouTube spoofs and parodies. This chapter aims to determine the impact of the controversial acts of spokes-character Peppa Pig on the brand’s reputation. To this end, this thesis is concerned with mapping consumer responses to parodies/spoofs, thereby exposing the potentially detrimental effects of unregulated consumer generated media. Using the single case study of Peppa Pig, a multimodal autonetnographic approach has been adopted whereby the researcher became a member of the YouTube community. The data were collected from auto-netnographic fieldnotes; comment threads; online in-depth interviews with creators of the controversial YouTube videos; online video elicitation interviews with consumers; and semi-structured face-to-face interviews with Peppa Pig licensing officials. The main conclusions drawn from this research were that the controversial acts of the spokes-character, via the YouTube spoofs/parodies, foster negative evaluations of the character. Yet, on the whole, this did not impact on consumers’ perception of the brand. Interestingly, threat to the brand’s reputation ensued from the company’s lack of regulation over the controversial content. As such, this research recommends that, in order to regain their brand management rights, and to safeguard against reputational damage, marketers must implement remedial measures, for instance the monitoring and filtering of consumer generated media.

AB - Spokes-characters have traditionally been presented in the literature as static entities, often likened to a trademark or logo, and discussed as a failsafe branding constituent. Meanwhile, celebrity spokespersons are presented as risk-bearing endorsers, due to the limited control brand managers have over their actions. However, with the rise of web 2.0 technologies, the new-fangled consumer-producer has the potential to rewrite the traditional handbook of spokes-character guidelines, presenting spokes-characters to be equally as erratic as their human counterparts. Studying an extension of consumer generated media, namely YouTube spoofs and parodies. This chapter aims to determine the impact of the controversial acts of spokes-character Peppa Pig on the brand’s reputation. To this end, this thesis is concerned with mapping consumer responses to parodies/spoofs, thereby exposing the potentially detrimental effects of unregulated consumer generated media. Using the single case study of Peppa Pig, a multimodal autonetnographic approach has been adopted whereby the researcher became a member of the YouTube community. The data were collected from auto-netnographic fieldnotes; comment threads; online in-depth interviews with creators of the controversial YouTube videos; online video elicitation interviews with consumers; and semi-structured face-to-face interviews with Peppa Pig licensing officials. The main conclusions drawn from this research were that the controversial acts of the spokes-character, via the YouTube spoofs/parodies, foster negative evaluations of the character. Yet, on the whole, this did not impact on consumers’ perception of the brand. Interestingly, threat to the brand’s reputation ensued from the company’s lack of regulation over the controversial content. As such, this research recommends that, in order to regain their brand management rights, and to safeguard against reputational damage, marketers must implement remedial measures, for instance the monitoring and filtering of consumer generated media.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-4438-6879-2

SP - 41

EP - 61

BT - Meaning and λόγος Proceedings from the Early Professional Interdisciplinary Conference

A2 - Hughes, Erica

PB - Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle Upon Tyne

ER -

Wilkinson C. I'm Peppa Shit: Spokes-characters 2.0 as Bearers of Reputational Risk? The Case of Peppa Pig”. In Hughes E, editor, Meaning and λόγος Proceedings from the Early Professional Interdisciplinary Conference. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle Upon Tyne. 2015. p. 41-61