Abstract
Acknowledging the power relations at play between researcher and participant is an
essential element in ‘doing’ inclusive education research. This provides a starting
point for recognising the difficulties in employing biographical approaches where
reinterpretation of the personal can provide a powerful context for reading the
implications of inclusive and exclusive educational practices. Taking a
researcher/participant joint reading of a research text, this paper examines the
ways in which our understandings of inclusionary/exclusionary educational
experiences are made and re-made in light of particular power relations. Drawing
on Paulo Freire’s notion of ‘praxis’, the paper employs a dialogic approach
where talk, reflection and action take the potentially inert research text and
render it useful. What emerged from a joint or ‘dialogic’ reading was a
reaffirmation of principal concerns about engagement with learning in relation to
literacy that had been masked by an original emphasis on research questions
relating to drawing practices and exclusive approaches to art education.
Emerging from this reflection is an exploration of the links between literacybased
educational experience and art education as a peripheral yet inclusive
environment. The paper concludes with an exploration of the possibility for
‘action’ where biographical experiences of education are brought back into an
educational context to create challenging and potentially transformative
experiences.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 143-155 |
Journal | International Journal of Inclusive Education |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 22 Nov 2011 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 22 Nov 2011 |
Keywords
- literacy
- art education
- praxis