‘I know it’s not proper research, but…’: how professionals’ understandings of research can frustrate its potential for CPD

STEPHEN CLAYTON, Mark O'Brien, Diane Burton, Anne Campbell, Anne Qualter, Tunde Varga-Atkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article draws upon the work of two researchers who facilitated practitioner research with school professionals in Liverpool. The researchers themselves had not been involved in practitioner research before. In this account, the researchers reflect critically upon their own experience. The discussion presents the learning curve that the researchers underwent as well as what they discovered about the relationship between practitioners and researchers when engaged in school‐based research. Crucially the issue of practitioners’ understandings of what constituted ‘good’ research emerged as a significant issue. In particular, positivist notions of research that drew from popular scientific understandings, as well as the culture of numerical targeting in the schools system, seemed to shape these practitioners’ sense of what was expected of them as practitioner‐researchers. The article finishes by reflecting upon the possible lessons that this work presents for education managers considering practitioner research approaches for continuing professional development (CPD).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-84
JournalEducational Action Research
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Feb 2008

Keywords

  • action research, practitioner research, positivism, researcher reflection, CPD

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘I know it’s not proper research, but…’: how professionals’ understandings of research can frustrate its potential for CPD'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this