How often do head and neck cancer patients raise concerns related to intimacy and sexuality in routine follow-up clinics?

Simon N Rogers, P Hazeldine, K O'Brien, D Lowe, Brenda Roe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intimacy and sexuality problems are underreported in head and neck cancer patients. The aim of this study was to collate the various prompts available in a routine follow-up clinic through the use of an intimacy screening question and Patient’s Concerns Inventory (PCI), and to identify how often these problems were raised by patients and what possible actions took place as a consequence. 177 patients completed the intimacy screening question, PCI and UW-QOLv.4 at follow-up clinics, from October 2008 to January 2011. Case note review identified if intimacy was mentioned in clinic letters and if referral for support was made. On the intimacy screening question, 15 % (26) reported problems of considerable/some concern (24) or selected intimacy/sexuality on the PCI (2). The PCI identified that 9 of the 24 reporting the worst problems wanted the topic discussed in clinic, and clinic letters suggested that 5 of these discussed the issue in clinic with 4 being referred on, 3 to a clinical psychologist and 1 to a clinical nurse specialist. Intimacy problems are underreported in clinic reviews. It is a difficult subject to discuss. It will remain a potential unmet need unless attempts are made to advance the opportunities for patient screening, information leaflets, staff training on how to talk about such sensitive issues and referral for counselling.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-217
JournalEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Volume272
Issue number1
Early online date14 Mar 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Sexuality
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Equipment and Supplies
Referral and Consultation
Nurse Clinicians
Counseling
Psychology

Cite this

@article{2286cc2a26d3487ea6886f54bcbf1b6e,
title = "How often do head and neck cancer patients raise concerns related to intimacy and sexuality in routine follow-up clinics?",
abstract = "Intimacy and sexuality problems are underreported in head and neck cancer patients. The aim of this study was to collate the various prompts available in a routine follow-up clinic through the use of an intimacy screening question and Patient’s Concerns Inventory (PCI), and to identify how often these problems were raised by patients and what possible actions took place as a consequence. 177 patients completed the intimacy screening question, PCI and UW-QOLv.4 at follow-up clinics, from October 2008 to January 2011. Case note review identified if intimacy was mentioned in clinic letters and if referral for support was made. On the intimacy screening question, 15 {\%} (26) reported problems of considerable/some concern (24) or selected intimacy/sexuality on the PCI (2). The PCI identified that 9 of the 24 reporting the worst problems wanted the topic discussed in clinic, and clinic letters suggested that 5 of these discussed the issue in clinic with 4 being referred on, 3 to a clinical psychologist and 1 to a clinical nurse specialist. Intimacy problems are underreported in clinic reviews. It is a difficult subject to discuss. It will remain a potential unmet need unless attempts are made to advance the opportunities for patient screening, information leaflets, staff training on how to talk about such sensitive issues and referral for counselling.",
author = "Rogers, {Simon N} and P Hazeldine and K O'Brien and D Lowe and Brenda Roe",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1007/s00405-014-2971-0",
language = "English",
volume = "272",
pages = "207--217",
journal = "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology",
issn = "0937-4477",
publisher = "springer",
number = "1",

}

How often do head and neck cancer patients raise concerns related to intimacy and sexuality in routine follow-up clinics? / Rogers, Simon N; Hazeldine, P; O'Brien, K; Lowe, D; Roe, Brenda.

In: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Vol. 272, No. 1, 31.01.2015, p. 207-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How often do head and neck cancer patients raise concerns related to intimacy and sexuality in routine follow-up clinics?

AU - Rogers, Simon N

AU - Hazeldine, P

AU - O'Brien, K

AU - Lowe, D

AU - Roe, Brenda

PY - 2015/1/31

Y1 - 2015/1/31

N2 - Intimacy and sexuality problems are underreported in head and neck cancer patients. The aim of this study was to collate the various prompts available in a routine follow-up clinic through the use of an intimacy screening question and Patient’s Concerns Inventory (PCI), and to identify how often these problems were raised by patients and what possible actions took place as a consequence. 177 patients completed the intimacy screening question, PCI and UW-QOLv.4 at follow-up clinics, from October 2008 to January 2011. Case note review identified if intimacy was mentioned in clinic letters and if referral for support was made. On the intimacy screening question, 15 % (26) reported problems of considerable/some concern (24) or selected intimacy/sexuality on the PCI (2). The PCI identified that 9 of the 24 reporting the worst problems wanted the topic discussed in clinic, and clinic letters suggested that 5 of these discussed the issue in clinic with 4 being referred on, 3 to a clinical psychologist and 1 to a clinical nurse specialist. Intimacy problems are underreported in clinic reviews. It is a difficult subject to discuss. It will remain a potential unmet need unless attempts are made to advance the opportunities for patient screening, information leaflets, staff training on how to talk about such sensitive issues and referral for counselling.

AB - Intimacy and sexuality problems are underreported in head and neck cancer patients. The aim of this study was to collate the various prompts available in a routine follow-up clinic through the use of an intimacy screening question and Patient’s Concerns Inventory (PCI), and to identify how often these problems were raised by patients and what possible actions took place as a consequence. 177 patients completed the intimacy screening question, PCI and UW-QOLv.4 at follow-up clinics, from October 2008 to January 2011. Case note review identified if intimacy was mentioned in clinic letters and if referral for support was made. On the intimacy screening question, 15 % (26) reported problems of considerable/some concern (24) or selected intimacy/sexuality on the PCI (2). The PCI identified that 9 of the 24 reporting the worst problems wanted the topic discussed in clinic, and clinic letters suggested that 5 of these discussed the issue in clinic with 4 being referred on, 3 to a clinical psychologist and 1 to a clinical nurse specialist. Intimacy problems are underreported in clinic reviews. It is a difficult subject to discuss. It will remain a potential unmet need unless attempts are made to advance the opportunities for patient screening, information leaflets, staff training on how to talk about such sensitive issues and referral for counselling.

U2 - 10.1007/s00405-014-2971-0

DO - 10.1007/s00405-014-2971-0

M3 - Article

VL - 272

SP - 207

EP - 217

JO - European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

JF - European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

SN - 0937-4477

IS - 1

ER -