From Wolff to Kelsen: The Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima

PETER LANGFORD, Ian Bryan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

A significant part of Kelsen’s work is devoted to the methodological separation of a theory of positive law from natural law. The predominant impression of this process is of a determination to entirely sunder the conceptual framework of positive law from any continuing reliance upon natural law. However, certain of Kelsen’s works involve the appropriation of the notion of civitas maxima from the Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum (1749) of Christian Wolff. The presence of this notion immediately raises the question of the relationship between Kelsen’s theoretical framework and the specific conception of natural law developed by Christian Wolff. It is through an examination of the transformation of this notion of civitas maxima that an important aspect of Kelsen’s relationship to the natural law tradition becomes apparent. The appropriation will be traced through the initial discussion in Kelsen’s Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts. Beitrag Zu Einer Reinen Rechtslehre (1920/1928), and its further exposition and development in Kelsen’s 1926 Lecture Course (‘Les Rapports de Système entre le Droit Interne et le Droit International’) at the l’Académie de droit international, in the Hague. In this manner, the significant methodological divergences between a Kelsenian theory of positive law, as a theory of legal monism according primacy to international law, and the Wolffian theory of natural law, as a theory of the law of nations, will become evident. This methodological divergence, however, should not obscure a more than residual affinity between Kelsen and Wolff concerning the cosmopolitical orientation of their thought.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition
EditorsPeter Langford, Ian Bryan, John McGarry
Place of PublicationLeiden
PublisherBrill Leiden, NL
Pages161-187
Number of pages26
ISBN (Print) 978-9004390386
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Mar 2019

Publication series

NameStudies in Moral Philosophy
PublisherBrill
Volume14
ISSN (Print)2211-2014

Fingerprint

natural law
positive law
divergence
law of nations
international law
examination

Cite this

LANGFORD, PETER., & Bryan, I. (2019). From Wolff to Kelsen: The Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima. In P. Langford, I. Bryan, & J. McGarry (Eds.), Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition (pp. 161-187). (Studies in Moral Philosophy; Vol. 14). Leiden: Brill Leiden, NL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004390393_006
LANGFORD, PETER ; Bryan, Ian. / From Wolff to Kelsen: The Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima. Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition. editor / Peter Langford ; Ian Bryan ; John McGarry. Leiden : Brill Leiden, NL, 2019. pp. 161-187 (Studies in Moral Philosophy).
@inbook{4bff3768d5ca4ecaa415a5080ba2bcfd,
title = "From Wolff to Kelsen: The Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima",
abstract = "A significant part of Kelsen’s work is devoted to the methodological separation of a theory of positive law from natural law. The predominant impression of this process is of a determination to entirely sunder the conceptual framework of positive law from any continuing reliance upon natural law. However, certain of Kelsen’s works involve the appropriation of the notion of civitas maxima from the Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum (1749) of Christian Wolff. The presence of this notion immediately raises the question of the relationship between Kelsen’s theoretical framework and the specific conception of natural law developed by Christian Wolff. It is through an examination of the transformation of this notion of civitas maxima that an important aspect of Kelsen’s relationship to the natural law tradition becomes apparent. The appropriation will be traced through the initial discussion in Kelsen’s Das Problem der Souver{\"a}nit{\"a}t und die Theorie des V{\"o}lkerrechts. Beitrag Zu Einer Reinen Rechtslehre (1920/1928), and its further exposition and development in Kelsen’s 1926 Lecture Course (‘Les Rapports de Syst{\`e}me entre le Droit Interne et le Droit International’) at the l’Acad{\'e}mie de droit international, in the Hague. In this manner, the significant methodological divergences between a Kelsenian theory of positive law, as a theory of legal monism according primacy to international law, and the Wolffian theory of natural law, as a theory of the law of nations, will become evident. This methodological divergence, however, should not obscure a more than residual affinity between Kelsen and Wolff concerning the cosmopolitical orientation of their thought.",
author = "PETER LANGFORD and Ian Bryan",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "19",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004390393_006",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-9004390386",
series = "Studies in Moral Philosophy",
publisher = "Brill Leiden, NL",
pages = "161--187",
editor = "Langford, {Peter } and Ian Bryan and John McGarry",
booktitle = "Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition",

}

LANGFORD, PETER & Bryan, I 2019, From Wolff to Kelsen: The Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima. in P Langford, I Bryan & J McGarry (eds), Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition. Studies in Moral Philosophy, vol. 14, Brill Leiden, NL, Leiden, pp. 161-187. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004390393_006

From Wolff to Kelsen: The Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima. / LANGFORD, PETER; Bryan, Ian.

Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition. ed. / Peter Langford; Ian Bryan; John McGarry. Leiden : Brill Leiden, NL, 2019. p. 161-187 (Studies in Moral Philosophy; Vol. 14).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - From Wolff to Kelsen: The Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima

AU - LANGFORD, PETER

AU - Bryan, Ian

PY - 2019/3/19

Y1 - 2019/3/19

N2 - A significant part of Kelsen’s work is devoted to the methodological separation of a theory of positive law from natural law. The predominant impression of this process is of a determination to entirely sunder the conceptual framework of positive law from any continuing reliance upon natural law. However, certain of Kelsen’s works involve the appropriation of the notion of civitas maxima from the Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum (1749) of Christian Wolff. The presence of this notion immediately raises the question of the relationship between Kelsen’s theoretical framework and the specific conception of natural law developed by Christian Wolff. It is through an examination of the transformation of this notion of civitas maxima that an important aspect of Kelsen’s relationship to the natural law tradition becomes apparent. The appropriation will be traced through the initial discussion in Kelsen’s Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts. Beitrag Zu Einer Reinen Rechtslehre (1920/1928), and its further exposition and development in Kelsen’s 1926 Lecture Course (‘Les Rapports de Système entre le Droit Interne et le Droit International’) at the l’Académie de droit international, in the Hague. In this manner, the significant methodological divergences between a Kelsenian theory of positive law, as a theory of legal monism according primacy to international law, and the Wolffian theory of natural law, as a theory of the law of nations, will become evident. This methodological divergence, however, should not obscure a more than residual affinity between Kelsen and Wolff concerning the cosmopolitical orientation of their thought.

AB - A significant part of Kelsen’s work is devoted to the methodological separation of a theory of positive law from natural law. The predominant impression of this process is of a determination to entirely sunder the conceptual framework of positive law from any continuing reliance upon natural law. However, certain of Kelsen’s works involve the appropriation of the notion of civitas maxima from the Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum (1749) of Christian Wolff. The presence of this notion immediately raises the question of the relationship between Kelsen’s theoretical framework and the specific conception of natural law developed by Christian Wolff. It is through an examination of the transformation of this notion of civitas maxima that an important aspect of Kelsen’s relationship to the natural law tradition becomes apparent. The appropriation will be traced through the initial discussion in Kelsen’s Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts. Beitrag Zu Einer Reinen Rechtslehre (1920/1928), and its further exposition and development in Kelsen’s 1926 Lecture Course (‘Les Rapports de Système entre le Droit Interne et le Droit International’) at the l’Académie de droit international, in the Hague. In this manner, the significant methodological divergences between a Kelsenian theory of positive law, as a theory of legal monism according primacy to international law, and the Wolffian theory of natural law, as a theory of the law of nations, will become evident. This methodological divergence, however, should not obscure a more than residual affinity between Kelsen and Wolff concerning the cosmopolitical orientation of their thought.

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004390393_006

DO - https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004390393_006

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-9004390386

T3 - Studies in Moral Philosophy

SP - 161

EP - 187

BT - Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition

A2 - Langford, Peter

A2 - Bryan, Ian

A2 - McGarry, John

PB - Brill Leiden, NL

CY - Leiden

ER -

LANGFORD PETER, Bryan I. From Wolff to Kelsen: The Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima. In Langford P, Bryan I, McGarry J, editors, Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition. Leiden: Brill Leiden, NL. 2019. p. 161-187. (Studies in Moral Philosophy). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004390393_006