From “Vulgar” and “Impossible” to “Pre-Eminently Readable”: Richard Marsh's Critical Fortunes, 1893–1915

Minna Vuohelainen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the critical fortunes of Richard Marsh (1857–1915), a best selling author of horror, crime, sensation, comic and romantic fiction. The paper charts the changing tone of reviews of Marsh's work as the author's popularity increased, his publication pattern stabilised and his publishers became more respectable. The focus of the paper will be on critical responses to Marsh's work in high-cultural reviews such as the Academy and the Athenaeum, which have been sampled as indicative of conservative views. The paper argues that after the publication of Marsh's best selling novel The Beetle: A Mystery in 1897, a clear shift is noticeable in reviews of his work from a dismissive attitude towards genre fiction to an appreciation of a recognised name within the niche market for sensational and romantic popular fiction. The paper charts this process of winning critical recognition for genre work, exploring the reasons for Marsh's shifting critical fortunes. In the process, it also traces the likely reception of other popular writers of the period.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)278-301
Number of pages24
JournalEnglish Studies
Volume95
Issue number3
Early online date13 May 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2014

Fingerprint

selling
genre
popular fiction
market niche
academy
popularity
writer
offense
Fortune
Charts
Indicative
Crime
Mystery
Names
Beetles
Popular Fiction
Writer
Niche
Romantic Fiction
Genre Fiction

Cite this

@article{8d46b1b4afb84d778494c7afa8abc21b,
title = "From “Vulgar” and “Impossible” to “Pre-Eminently Readable”: Richard Marsh's Critical Fortunes, 1893–1915",
abstract = "This paper examines the critical fortunes of Richard Marsh (1857–1915), a best selling author of horror, crime, sensation, comic and romantic fiction. The paper charts the changing tone of reviews of Marsh's work as the author's popularity increased, his publication pattern stabilised and his publishers became more respectable. The focus of the paper will be on critical responses to Marsh's work in high-cultural reviews such as the Academy and the Athenaeum, which have been sampled as indicative of conservative views. The paper argues that after the publication of Marsh's best selling novel The Beetle: A Mystery in 1897, a clear shift is noticeable in reviews of his work from a dismissive attitude towards genre fiction to an appreciation of a recognised name within the niche market for sensational and romantic popular fiction. The paper charts this process of winning critical recognition for genre work, exploring the reasons for Marsh's shifting critical fortunes. In the process, it also traces the likely reception of other popular writers of the period.",
author = "Minna Vuohelainen",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1080/0013838X.2014.897087",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "278--301",
journal = "English Studies",
issn = "0013-838X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

From “Vulgar” and “Impossible” to “Pre-Eminently Readable”: Richard Marsh's Critical Fortunes, 1893–1915. / Vuohelainen, Minna.

In: English Studies, Vol. 95, No. 3, 05.2014, p. 278-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - From “Vulgar” and “Impossible” to “Pre-Eminently Readable”: Richard Marsh's Critical Fortunes, 1893–1915

AU - Vuohelainen, Minna

PY - 2014/5

Y1 - 2014/5

N2 - This paper examines the critical fortunes of Richard Marsh (1857–1915), a best selling author of horror, crime, sensation, comic and romantic fiction. The paper charts the changing tone of reviews of Marsh's work as the author's popularity increased, his publication pattern stabilised and his publishers became more respectable. The focus of the paper will be on critical responses to Marsh's work in high-cultural reviews such as the Academy and the Athenaeum, which have been sampled as indicative of conservative views. The paper argues that after the publication of Marsh's best selling novel The Beetle: A Mystery in 1897, a clear shift is noticeable in reviews of his work from a dismissive attitude towards genre fiction to an appreciation of a recognised name within the niche market for sensational and romantic popular fiction. The paper charts this process of winning critical recognition for genre work, exploring the reasons for Marsh's shifting critical fortunes. In the process, it also traces the likely reception of other popular writers of the period.

AB - This paper examines the critical fortunes of Richard Marsh (1857–1915), a best selling author of horror, crime, sensation, comic and romantic fiction. The paper charts the changing tone of reviews of Marsh's work as the author's popularity increased, his publication pattern stabilised and his publishers became more respectable. The focus of the paper will be on critical responses to Marsh's work in high-cultural reviews such as the Academy and the Athenaeum, which have been sampled as indicative of conservative views. The paper argues that after the publication of Marsh's best selling novel The Beetle: A Mystery in 1897, a clear shift is noticeable in reviews of his work from a dismissive attitude towards genre fiction to an appreciation of a recognised name within the niche market for sensational and romantic popular fiction. The paper charts this process of winning critical recognition for genre work, exploring the reasons for Marsh's shifting critical fortunes. In the process, it also traces the likely reception of other popular writers of the period.

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/vulgar-impossible-preeminently-readable-richard-marshs-critical-fortunes-18931915

U2 - 10.1080/0013838X.2014.897087

DO - 10.1080/0013838X.2014.897087

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 278

EP - 301

JO - English Studies

JF - English Studies

SN - 0013-838X

IS - 3

ER -