From ‘clientilism’ to transformational leadership? An autoethnographic journey from Soviet Georgia to the UK. Journal of Organizational Ethnography.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose –The paper aims to contribute to the ethnographic tradition in the educational leadership literature through providing an autoethnographic critical analysis of the idiosyncrasies of leadership across two different socio-political environments: a Soviet educational establishment and a contemporary UK higher education institution. Design/methodology/approach – In a previous issue, Doloriert and Sambrook (2012) argued that autoethnographic approach could help to uncover some experiences and voices that previously were silenced due to the discomfort they caused. In response to this claim and with consideration of three epistemological possibilities of autoethnography as suggested by Doloriert and Sambrook (2012), the author uses narrative accounts of personal experiences of leadership in Soviet Georgia and in the UK as the main source of data in the attempt to demonstrate how the three epistemological positions overlap and complement each other in the context of a critical autoethnography. Findings – The paper argues that autoethnographic approach can provide a unique opportunity for a simultaneous analysis of the particularities of leadership practice across different socio-political environments, whereas the ‘three positions’ approach could be used as an expedient template for further exploration of educational leadership. The paper also suggests there are some parallels between current leadership practice in the UK higher education and Soviet system of ‘clientilism’. Originality/value – This paper is one of the first attempts to use autoethnography as an analytical tool for comparing leadership patterns in two contrasting socio-political structures.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Organizational Ethnography
Early online date24 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

ethnography
leadership
simultaneous analysis
soviet system
political structure
Transformational leadership
Organizational ethnography
education system
experience
narrative
Autoethnography
methodology
Values
education
Political environment
Educational leadership

Keywords

  • Autoethnography
  • Soviet
  • leadership
  • higher education
  • clientilism

Cite this

@article{5ad08739840e47e198c1b76cf817e597,
title = "From ‘clientilism’ to transformational leadership? An autoethnographic journey from Soviet Georgia to the UK. Journal of Organizational Ethnography.",
abstract = "Purpose –The paper aims to contribute to the ethnographic tradition in the educational leadership literature through providing an autoethnographic critical analysis of the idiosyncrasies of leadership across two different socio-political environments: a Soviet educational establishment and a contemporary UK higher education institution. Design/methodology/approach – In a previous issue, Doloriert and Sambrook (2012) argued that autoethnographic approach could help to uncover some experiences and voices that previously were silenced due to the discomfort they caused. In response to this claim and with consideration of three epistemological possibilities of autoethnography as suggested by Doloriert and Sambrook (2012), the author uses narrative accounts of personal experiences of leadership in Soviet Georgia and in the UK as the main source of data in the attempt to demonstrate how the three epistemological positions overlap and complement each other in the context of a critical autoethnography. Findings – The paper argues that autoethnographic approach can provide a unique opportunity for a simultaneous analysis of the particularities of leadership practice across different socio-political environments, whereas the ‘three positions’ approach could be used as an expedient template for further exploration of educational leadership. The paper also suggests there are some parallels between current leadership practice in the UK higher education and Soviet system of ‘clientilism’. Originality/value – This paper is one of the first attempts to use autoethnography as an analytical tool for comparing leadership patterns in two contrasting socio-political structures.",
keywords = "Autoethnography, Soviet, leadership, higher education, clientilism",
author = "Liana Beattie",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1108/JOE-09-2017-0044",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Organizational Ethnography",
issn = "2046-6749",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From ‘clientilism’ to transformational leadership? An autoethnographic journey from Soviet Georgia to the UK. Journal of Organizational Ethnography.

AU - Beattie, Liana

PY - 2018/6/24

Y1 - 2018/6/24

N2 - Purpose –The paper aims to contribute to the ethnographic tradition in the educational leadership literature through providing an autoethnographic critical analysis of the idiosyncrasies of leadership across two different socio-political environments: a Soviet educational establishment and a contemporary UK higher education institution. Design/methodology/approach – In a previous issue, Doloriert and Sambrook (2012) argued that autoethnographic approach could help to uncover some experiences and voices that previously were silenced due to the discomfort they caused. In response to this claim and with consideration of three epistemological possibilities of autoethnography as suggested by Doloriert and Sambrook (2012), the author uses narrative accounts of personal experiences of leadership in Soviet Georgia and in the UK as the main source of data in the attempt to demonstrate how the three epistemological positions overlap and complement each other in the context of a critical autoethnography. Findings – The paper argues that autoethnographic approach can provide a unique opportunity for a simultaneous analysis of the particularities of leadership practice across different socio-political environments, whereas the ‘three positions’ approach could be used as an expedient template for further exploration of educational leadership. The paper also suggests there are some parallels between current leadership practice in the UK higher education and Soviet system of ‘clientilism’. Originality/value – This paper is one of the first attempts to use autoethnography as an analytical tool for comparing leadership patterns in two contrasting socio-political structures.

AB - Purpose –The paper aims to contribute to the ethnographic tradition in the educational leadership literature through providing an autoethnographic critical analysis of the idiosyncrasies of leadership across two different socio-political environments: a Soviet educational establishment and a contemporary UK higher education institution. Design/methodology/approach – In a previous issue, Doloriert and Sambrook (2012) argued that autoethnographic approach could help to uncover some experiences and voices that previously were silenced due to the discomfort they caused. In response to this claim and with consideration of three epistemological possibilities of autoethnography as suggested by Doloriert and Sambrook (2012), the author uses narrative accounts of personal experiences of leadership in Soviet Georgia and in the UK as the main source of data in the attempt to demonstrate how the three epistemological positions overlap and complement each other in the context of a critical autoethnography. Findings – The paper argues that autoethnographic approach can provide a unique opportunity for a simultaneous analysis of the particularities of leadership practice across different socio-political environments, whereas the ‘three positions’ approach could be used as an expedient template for further exploration of educational leadership. The paper also suggests there are some parallels between current leadership practice in the UK higher education and Soviet system of ‘clientilism’. Originality/value – This paper is one of the first attempts to use autoethnography as an analytical tool for comparing leadership patterns in two contrasting socio-political structures.

KW - Autoethnography

KW - Soviet

KW - leadership

KW - higher education

KW - clientilism

U2 - 10.1108/JOE-09-2017-0044

DO - 10.1108/JOE-09-2017-0044

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Organizational Ethnography

JF - Journal of Organizational Ethnography

SN - 2046-6749

ER -