Abstract
The purpose of this article is threefold: (1) to provide an analysis of autoethnography as a method in policing research; (2) to distinguish between policing as a practice and policing as an institution; and (3) to outline the characteristics of policing as a practice. I deploy an autoethnographic method to identify the characteristics of the practice of city policing in democracies. These characteristics – heroic struggle, edgework, absolute sacrifice, and worldmaking – draw attention to a crucial mismatch between policing as a practice and policing as an institution. I conclude by suggesting ways in which the characteristics of the practice can provide a firm foundation for further research into the contemporary problems of policing as an institution.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1842-1853 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Policing (Oxford) |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 18 Jun 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 27 Sept 2021 |
Keywords
- autoethnography
- cop culture
- professionalism
- urban policing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Four Characteristics of Policing as a Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver