Femvertising and fast fashion: Feminist advertising or fauxminist marketing messages?

Francesca Sobande

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

As part of the following commentary there is consideration of how the mainstreaming of ‘intersectional feminism’ is implicated in allegedly ‘feminist advertising’ by fast fashion brands H&M, Boohoo and Missguided, ultimately to generate profit. Feminist thought has involved critique of how capitalist systems are entangled with sexist structures that contribute to the subjugation of women (Davis 1981). Nevertheless, despite such contentions, the notion of what scholars such as Åkestam, Dahlen and Rosengren (2017) call ‘femvertising’ (feminist advertising), has recently emerged in marketing rhetoric and beyond. In this commentary, I argue that ultimately, such femvertising still upholds the profit-oriented idea that women must buy and consume certain products, in order to affirm themselves and the market-bound sense of ‘feminism’ that is being promoted. I explore the extent to which such marketing is reflective of a commitment to feminism, or is a false (fauxminist) attempt to convey a brand’s investment in women’s equality and empowerment. Through the analysis of advertisements of fast fashion brands I illustrate the ways in which feminist-coded content is effectively and ineffectively used, as well as discarded, as part of fast fashion marketing messages of inclusivity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-112
JournalInternational Journal of Fashion Studies
Volume6
Issue number1
Early online date30 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 30 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

marketing
feminism
profit
empowerment
equality
rhetoric
Marketing
commitment
market
Feminism
Fashion Brand
Profit

Keywords

  • branding
  • feminism
  • femvertising
  • marketing

Cite this

@article{285d298b7ad84f04ae96bfb6bc0fa656,
title = "Femvertising and fast fashion: Feminist advertising or fauxminist marketing messages?",
abstract = "As part of the following commentary there is consideration of how the mainstreaming of ‘intersectional feminism’ is implicated in allegedly ‘feminist advertising’ by fast fashion brands H&M, Boohoo and Missguided, ultimately to generate profit. Feminist thought has involved critique of how capitalist systems are entangled with sexist structures that contribute to the subjugation of women (Davis 1981). Nevertheless, despite such contentions, the notion of what scholars such as {\AA}kestam, Dahlen and Rosengren (2017) call ‘femvertising’ (feminist advertising), has recently emerged in marketing rhetoric and beyond. In this commentary, I argue that ultimately, such femvertising still upholds the profit-oriented idea that women must buy and consume certain products, in order to affirm themselves and the market-bound sense of ‘feminism’ that is being promoted. I explore the extent to which such marketing is reflective of a commitment to feminism, or is a false (fauxminist) attempt to convey a brand’s investment in women’s equality and empowerment. Through the analysis of advertisements of fast fashion brands I illustrate the ways in which feminist-coded content is effectively and ineffectively used, as well as discarded, as part of fast fashion marketing messages of inclusivity.",
keywords = "branding, feminism, femvertising, marketing",
author = "Francesca Sobande",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1386/infs.6.1.105_7",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "105--112",
journal = "International Journal of Fashion Studies",
issn = "2051-7106",
publisher = "Intellect",
number = "1",

}

Femvertising and fast fashion: Feminist advertising or fauxminist marketing messages? / Sobande, Francesca.

In: International Journal of Fashion Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1, 30.04.2019, p. 105-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Femvertising and fast fashion: Feminist advertising or fauxminist marketing messages?

AU - Sobande, Francesca

PY - 2019/4/30

Y1 - 2019/4/30

N2 - As part of the following commentary there is consideration of how the mainstreaming of ‘intersectional feminism’ is implicated in allegedly ‘feminist advertising’ by fast fashion brands H&M, Boohoo and Missguided, ultimately to generate profit. Feminist thought has involved critique of how capitalist systems are entangled with sexist structures that contribute to the subjugation of women (Davis 1981). Nevertheless, despite such contentions, the notion of what scholars such as Åkestam, Dahlen and Rosengren (2017) call ‘femvertising’ (feminist advertising), has recently emerged in marketing rhetoric and beyond. In this commentary, I argue that ultimately, such femvertising still upholds the profit-oriented idea that women must buy and consume certain products, in order to affirm themselves and the market-bound sense of ‘feminism’ that is being promoted. I explore the extent to which such marketing is reflective of a commitment to feminism, or is a false (fauxminist) attempt to convey a brand’s investment in women’s equality and empowerment. Through the analysis of advertisements of fast fashion brands I illustrate the ways in which feminist-coded content is effectively and ineffectively used, as well as discarded, as part of fast fashion marketing messages of inclusivity.

AB - As part of the following commentary there is consideration of how the mainstreaming of ‘intersectional feminism’ is implicated in allegedly ‘feminist advertising’ by fast fashion brands H&M, Boohoo and Missguided, ultimately to generate profit. Feminist thought has involved critique of how capitalist systems are entangled with sexist structures that contribute to the subjugation of women (Davis 1981). Nevertheless, despite such contentions, the notion of what scholars such as Åkestam, Dahlen and Rosengren (2017) call ‘femvertising’ (feminist advertising), has recently emerged in marketing rhetoric and beyond. In this commentary, I argue that ultimately, such femvertising still upholds the profit-oriented idea that women must buy and consume certain products, in order to affirm themselves and the market-bound sense of ‘feminism’ that is being promoted. I explore the extent to which such marketing is reflective of a commitment to feminism, or is a false (fauxminist) attempt to convey a brand’s investment in women’s equality and empowerment. Through the analysis of advertisements of fast fashion brands I illustrate the ways in which feminist-coded content is effectively and ineffectively used, as well as discarded, as part of fast fashion marketing messages of inclusivity.

KW - branding

KW - feminism

KW - femvertising

KW - marketing

U2 - 10.1386/infs.6.1.105_7

DO - 10.1386/infs.6.1.105_7

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 105

EP - 112

JO - International Journal of Fashion Studies

JF - International Journal of Fashion Studies

SN - 2051-7106

IS - 1

ER -