Feminist Research and Philosophical Hermeneutics: Overlaps and Synergies

Laura Anne Bliss, John McGarry

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

For a long time, social research was essentially ‘male study of male society’ (Millman and Kanter 1987, 30). Thus, women were ‘subjected’ to research in a top-down manner, from a distant and privileged position. Over time, and as a challenge to this, feminist researchers developed methods of conducting research with the aim of empowering women, valuing their experience and promoting equality between researcher and researched. These aspects of feminist research echo the non-hierarchical approach implicit in Hans-Georg Gadamer’s exposition of philosophical hermeneutics and, particularly, in his account of a true conversation. For Gadamer, a true conversation is characterised by an openness, receptiveness and non-dogmatic willingness to learn: ‘there is no higher principle than this: holding oneself open to the conversation … recognizing in advance the possibility that your [conversation] partner may be right, even recognizing the possible superiority of your partner’ (Gadamer 1997). In such a conversation ‘one does not try to argue the other person down but that one really considers the weight of the other’s opinion’ (Gadamer 1960, 367). Drawing on existing work (eg: Okin 1989; Warnke 1993; Hoffmann 2002), this paper seeks to explore the overlaps and synergies between the central principles of feminist research and philosophical hermeneutics, specifically Gadamer’s account of a true conversation.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2017
EventSocio-Legal Studies Association (SLSA) Annual Conference - Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
Duration: 5 Apr 20177 Apr 2017

Conference

ConferenceSocio-Legal Studies Association (SLSA) Annual Conference
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityNewcastle
Period5/04/177/04/17

Fingerprint

hermeneutics
synergy
conversation
social research
equality
human being
experience

Cite this

Bliss, L. A., & McGarry, J. (2017). Feminist Research and Philosophical Hermeneutics: Overlaps and Synergies. Paper presented at Socio-Legal Studies Association (SLSA) Annual Conference, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Bliss, Laura Anne ; McGarry, John. / Feminist Research and Philosophical Hermeneutics: Overlaps and Synergies. Paper presented at Socio-Legal Studies Association (SLSA) Annual Conference, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
@conference{4aff90147f67443eb59b31ef32405091,
title = "Feminist Research and Philosophical Hermeneutics: Overlaps and Synergies",
abstract = "For a long time, social research was essentially ‘male study of male society’ (Millman and Kanter 1987, 30). Thus, women were ‘subjected’ to research in a top-down manner, from a distant and privileged position. Over time, and as a challenge to this, feminist researchers developed methods of conducting research with the aim of empowering women, valuing their experience and promoting equality between researcher and researched. These aspects of feminist research echo the non-hierarchical approach implicit in Hans-Georg Gadamer’s exposition of philosophical hermeneutics and, particularly, in his account of a true conversation. For Gadamer, a true conversation is characterised by an openness, receptiveness and non-dogmatic willingness to learn: ‘there is no higher principle than this: holding oneself open to the conversation … recognizing in advance the possibility that your [conversation] partner may be right, even recognizing the possible superiority of your partner’ (Gadamer 1997). In such a conversation ‘one does not try to argue the other person down but that one really considers the weight of the other’s opinion’ (Gadamer 1960, 367). Drawing on existing work (eg: Okin 1989; Warnke 1993; Hoffmann 2002), this paper seeks to explore the overlaps and synergies between the central principles of feminist research and philosophical hermeneutics, specifically Gadamer’s account of a true conversation.",
author = "Bliss, {Laura Anne} and John McGarry",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
note = "Socio-Legal Studies Association (SLSA) Annual Conference ; Conference date: 05-04-2017 Through 07-04-2017",

}

Bliss, LA & McGarry, J 2017, 'Feminist Research and Philosophical Hermeneutics: Overlaps and Synergies' Paper presented at Socio-Legal Studies Association (SLSA) Annual Conference, Newcastle, United Kingdom, 5/04/17 - 7/04/17, .

Feminist Research and Philosophical Hermeneutics: Overlaps and Synergies. / Bliss, Laura Anne; McGarry, John.

2017. Paper presented at Socio-Legal Studies Association (SLSA) Annual Conference, Newcastle, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Feminist Research and Philosophical Hermeneutics: Overlaps and Synergies

AU - Bliss, Laura Anne

AU - McGarry, John

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - For a long time, social research was essentially ‘male study of male society’ (Millman and Kanter 1987, 30). Thus, women were ‘subjected’ to research in a top-down manner, from a distant and privileged position. Over time, and as a challenge to this, feminist researchers developed methods of conducting research with the aim of empowering women, valuing their experience and promoting equality between researcher and researched. These aspects of feminist research echo the non-hierarchical approach implicit in Hans-Georg Gadamer’s exposition of philosophical hermeneutics and, particularly, in his account of a true conversation. For Gadamer, a true conversation is characterised by an openness, receptiveness and non-dogmatic willingness to learn: ‘there is no higher principle than this: holding oneself open to the conversation … recognizing in advance the possibility that your [conversation] partner may be right, even recognizing the possible superiority of your partner’ (Gadamer 1997). In such a conversation ‘one does not try to argue the other person down but that one really considers the weight of the other’s opinion’ (Gadamer 1960, 367). Drawing on existing work (eg: Okin 1989; Warnke 1993; Hoffmann 2002), this paper seeks to explore the overlaps and synergies between the central principles of feminist research and philosophical hermeneutics, specifically Gadamer’s account of a true conversation.

AB - For a long time, social research was essentially ‘male study of male society’ (Millman and Kanter 1987, 30). Thus, women were ‘subjected’ to research in a top-down manner, from a distant and privileged position. Over time, and as a challenge to this, feminist researchers developed methods of conducting research with the aim of empowering women, valuing their experience and promoting equality between researcher and researched. These aspects of feminist research echo the non-hierarchical approach implicit in Hans-Georg Gadamer’s exposition of philosophical hermeneutics and, particularly, in his account of a true conversation. For Gadamer, a true conversation is characterised by an openness, receptiveness and non-dogmatic willingness to learn: ‘there is no higher principle than this: holding oneself open to the conversation … recognizing in advance the possibility that your [conversation] partner may be right, even recognizing the possible superiority of your partner’ (Gadamer 1997). In such a conversation ‘one does not try to argue the other person down but that one really considers the weight of the other’s opinion’ (Gadamer 1960, 367). Drawing on existing work (eg: Okin 1989; Warnke 1993; Hoffmann 2002), this paper seeks to explore the overlaps and synergies between the central principles of feminist research and philosophical hermeneutics, specifically Gadamer’s account of a true conversation.

M3 - Paper

ER -

Bliss LA, McGarry J. Feminist Research and Philosophical Hermeneutics: Overlaps and Synergies. 2017. Paper presented at Socio-Legal Studies Association (SLSA) Annual Conference, Newcastle, United Kingdom.