‘Fanciful associations’: The Perverse Endurance of Derrida’s [sic] ‘logical phallusies’

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

Abstract

This article concerns the expression ‘logical phallusies’, imputed to Jacques Derrida by Barry Smith in 1992 in a letter arguing against the proposed award to Derrida of an honorary doctorate at Cambridge. Derrida insisted that this expression appeared nowhere in his oeuvre – it has never been found – and yet it has endured, in discussions of Derrida’s work and general legacy, more than any other aspect of Derrida’s ‘Cambridge Affair’. I address two cases of the expression’s weird stubbornness, arguing that its misattribution to Derrida is a gesture which Derrida’s work guards against and undermines – even deconstructs – in advance. The article sounds a note of caution about the ‘post-theoretical’ practice of assimilating philosophers and theorists to the humanities via the decontextualised appropriation of putatively synecdochic buzzwords.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-101
Number of pages15
JournalCritical Survey
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2022

Keywords

  • derrida
  • post-theoretical
  • philosophers
  • theorists

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘Fanciful associations’: The Perverse Endurance of Derrida’s [sic] ‘logical phallusies’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this