@article{2fb197abdd064c97909be61abcae0755,
title = "{\textquoteleft}Fanciful associations{\textquoteright}: The Perverse Endurance of Derrida{\textquoteright}s [sic] {\textquoteleft}logical phallusies{\textquoteright}",
abstract = "This article concerns the expression {\textquoteleft}logical phallusies{\textquoteright}, imputed to Jacques Derrida by Barry Smith in 1992 in a letter arguing against the proposed award to Derrida of an honorary doctorate at Cambridge. Derrida insisted that this expression appeared nowhere in his oeuvre – it has never been found – and yet it has endured, in discussions of Derrida{\textquoteright}s work and general legacy, more than any other aspect of Derrida{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteleft}Cambridge Affair{\textquoteright}. I address two cases of the expression{\textquoteright}s weird stubbornness, arguing that its misattribution to Derrida is a gesture which Derrida{\textquoteright}s work guards against and undermines – even deconstructs – in advance. The article sounds a note of caution about the {\textquoteleft}post-theoretical{\textquoteright} practice of assimilating philosophers and theorists to the humanities via the decontextualised appropriation of putatively synecdochic buzzwords.",
keywords = "derrida, post-theoretical, philosophers, theorists",
author = "Niall Gildea",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Berghahn Journals, Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.3167/cs.2021.340107",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "87--101",
journal = "Critical Survey",
issn = "0011-1570",
publisher = "Berghahn Journals",
number = "1",
}