Examining the British PhD viva: Opening new doors or scarring for life?

Bernie Carter*, Karen Whittaker

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

    26 Citations (Scopus)


    The PhD viva - regardless of its format - has the potential to be a signifi cant rite of passage for the student. It is an experience that can resonate for months or years afterwards. Part of the challenge is that for everyone involved - student, supervisory team and examiners - a degree of end-point uncertainty exists. These ambiguities and tensions are perhaps an inherent part of any examination but are particularly characteristic of the examination of the individual and unique body of work that constitutes the doctoral thesis. In recent years, increased attention has been placed on the processes that surround the examination, aiming to increase transparency, consistency and fairness. However, the process of examining a student and their thesis remains challenging and is surrounded by different agendas, ideologies and practices. This paper examines some of the issues surrounding the PhD viva, primarily focusing on the British viva whilst weaving in commentary about the Australian system.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)169-178
    Number of pages10
    JournalContemporary Nurse
    Issue number1-2
    Publication statusPublished - May 2009


    • Assessment
    • Doctoral
    • Examination
    • PhD
    • Viva


    Dive into the research topics of 'Examining the British PhD viva: Opening new doors or scarring for life?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this