Evaluation of the Quality & Nursing Team Peer Review Programme (Executive Summary)

AXEL KAEHNE; Tom Simcock; Alan Boyd; JULIE FEATHER

Evaluation of the Quality & Nursing Team Peer Review Programme (Executive Summary)

AXEL KAEHNE, Tom Simcock, Alan Boyd, JULIE FEATHER

University of Manchester

Research output: Book/Report › Commissioned report

66 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The NHS England and NHS Improvement Quality & Nursing Team (QNT) commissioned the Unit for Evaluation and Policy Analysis (EPA) at Edge Hill University in collaboration with Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester to conduct an evaluation of the QNT peer review programme. Building upon previous research, the aim of this evaluation was to obtain a picture of the effectiveness, strengths, and weaknesses of the peer review process and the feedback regime.

Original language	English
Place of Publication	Ormskirk, England
Publisher	Edge Hill University
Commissioning body	NHS Improvement Quality and Nursing Team (QNT)
Publication status	Published - 6 Aug 2021

Keywords

peer review

Access to Document

QNT Evaluation June 2021 Exec SummaryFinal published version, 1.11 MB

1 Commissioned report

Evaluation of the Quality & Nursing Team Peer Review Programme
Kaehne, A., Simcock, T., Boyd, A. & Feather, J., 6 Aug 2021, Ormskirk, England: Edge Hill University.
Research output: Book/Report › Commissioned report

Open Access
File

1 Finished

Evaluation of the Quality Surveillance Team (QST) Peer Review Programme
KAEHNE, A. (PI), Simcock, T. (CoI) & Boyd, A. (CoI)
1/04/20 → 15/03/21
Project: Research

Cite this

@book{21ac20dd7548461695b448f6e859d70d,

title = "Evaluation of the Quality & Nursing Team Peer Review Programme (Executive Summary)",

abstract = "The NHS England and NHS Improvement Quality & Nursing Team (QNT) commissioned the Unit for Evaluation and Policy Analysis (EPA) at Edge Hill University in collaboration with Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester to conduct an evaluation of the QNT peer review programme. Building upon previous research, the aim of this evaluation was to obtain a picture of the effectiveness, strengths, and weaknesses of the peer review process and the feedback regime.",

keywords = "peer review",

author = "AXEL KAEHNE and Tom Simcock and Alan Boyd and JULIE FEATHER",

year = "2021",

month = aug,

day = "6",

language = "English",

publisher = "Edge Hill University",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Evaluation of the Quality & Nursing Team Peer Review Programme (Executive Summary)

AU - KAEHNE, AXEL

AU - Simcock, Tom

AU - Boyd, Alan

AU - FEATHER, JULIE

PY - 2021/8/6

Y1 - 2021/8/6

N2 - The NHS England and NHS Improvement Quality & Nursing Team (QNT) commissioned the Unit for Evaluation and Policy Analysis (EPA) at Edge Hill University in collaboration with Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester to conduct an evaluation of the QNT peer review programme. Building upon previous research, the aim of this evaluation was to obtain a picture of the effectiveness, strengths, and weaknesses of the peer review process and the feedback regime.

AB - The NHS England and NHS Improvement Quality & Nursing Team (QNT) commissioned the Unit for Evaluation and Policy Analysis (EPA) at Edge Hill University in collaboration with Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester to conduct an evaluation of the QNT peer review programme. Building upon previous research, the aim of this evaluation was to obtain a picture of the effectiveness, strengths, and weaknesses of the peer review process and the feedback regime.

KW - peer review

M3 - Commissioned report

BT - Evaluation of the Quality & Nursing Team Peer Review Programme (Executive Summary)

PB - Edge Hill University

CY - Ormskirk, England

ER -

Evaluation of the Quality & Nursing Team Peer Review Programme (Executive Summary)

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Research output

Evaluation of the Quality & Nursing Team Peer Review Programme

Projects

Evaluation of the Quality Surveillance Team (QST) Peer Review Programme

Cite this