Abstract
Objectives: The objectives of the study were: to provide an overview of
approaches to methodological search filter development; to identify and
critically review the stages of methodological search filter development; to
devise a search filter appraisal checklist based on the review.
Methods: An iterative approach to searching was employed utilizing health
and library databases, the world wide web and citation searching. Further systematic methods included hand searching of key journals in the field of search
filter development, contacting known experts in the field and scanning reference
lists of relevant papers to identify additional studies. Altogether, 51 potentially
relevant papers were found, of which 20 met the inclusion criteria.
Results: Four stages of search filter development were identified from the
literature (search term selection, identification of a gold standard, evaluation
and validation). Variations in the methods used to approach these four stages
were identified, most importantly in the extent to which search filters are tested
and validated.
Conclusion: Awareness of the process and limitations involved in search filter
development is essential to make an informed decision on the applicability and
validity of search filters. The findings of this review indicate a considerable
agenda for future research, in particular, to improve the quality of reporting of
search filters and to inform users on their use and application. Based on the
review, guidance in the appraisal process of search filters is given in the form of
a checklist.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 148-163 |
Journal | Health Information & Libraries Journal |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 3 |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2004 |
Keywords
- Methodological Search Filters Information Retrieval Healthcare Databases Systematic Review