Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Enhancing emergency front-of-neck airway training: a mixed methods study on the impact of external noise and startle stressors: Stress and Startle

  • James Cassidy
  • , Jennifer Reynolds
  • , Tamryn Miller
  • , Thomas Miller
  • , JEREMY BROWN
  • , Ben Morton
  • , Peter Groom*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
  • Alder Hey Children's Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: Our aim was to investigate whether emergency front-of-neck airway training utilising low-fidelity manikins in a ‘tea-trolley’ format could be improved by the incorporation of stress inoculation training. This would be an important advance as clinicians report that cognitive overload impairs performance during real emergencies. We hypothesised that environmental noise and simulated blood splatter would result in a heightened stress experience. Methods: Thirteen anaesthetic residents completed the study, performing emergency front-of-neck access first under non-stressed conditions and later with the addition of noise and startle stressors. The primary outcome was a change in salivary cortisol, measured before and after each training session. Secondary outcomes included participant proficiency; time to perform the procedure; and perceived stress and utility of the training. Semi-structured interviews explored participant perceptions of the training. Results: Environmental noise and simulated blood splatter resulted in a quantitatively and qualitatively heightened stressful experience for the participants in paired comparisons. There was no significant change in median (IQR [range]) salivary cortisol levels after participants completed the non-stressed training: 6.4 (4.3–8.1 [3.3–16.2]) nmol.l -1 vs. 9.2 (5.8–11.3 [3.8–14.1]) nmol.l -1, respectively (p = 0.133). There were, however, significant changes following stressed training: 4.9 (4.3–11.6 [1.1–11.6]) mol.l -1 vs. 9.2 (8.0–12.1 [4.4–20.1]) nmol.l -1, respectively (p = 0.005). Participants' semi-structured interviews and questionnaire results evidenced that the adaptations created a more stressful yet valuable training experience. Discussion: Environmental noise and simulated blood splatter increased participant stress. Participants performed emergency front-of-neck access equally well in both sessions, suggesting this technical skill is stored in their stress-resistant long-term memory. These relatively low-cost adaptations could enhance emergency front-of-neck airway tea-trolley training by facilitating stress inoculation training and so better prepare clinicians for real-world emergencies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1216-1225
Number of pages10
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume80
Issue number10
Early online date17 Jun 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 17 Jun 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education

Keywords

  • Simulation Training
  • anaesthesia
  • mixed methods
  • stressors
  • Medical education
  • eFONA
  • technical skills training
  • stress inoculation training
  • emergency front-of-neck airway

Research Groups

  • Workforce Sustainability & Development Research Group

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enhancing emergency front-of-neck airway training: a mixed methods study on the impact of external noise and startle stressors: Stress and Startle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this