Effects of timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults: systematic review

Joan Ostaszkiewicz, Brenda Roe, Linda Johnston

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim.  The aim of this paper is to present a systematic review assessing the effectiveness of timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults. Background.  Despite the widespread use of systematic voiding programmes, their effectiveness is unclear, and the evidence for timed voiding has not been subject to rigorous and systematic evaluation. The impact on psychosocial factors and cost is also untested. The physiological basis for timed voiding is also poorly established. Methods.  The systematic review incorporated the methodology of the Cochrane Collaboration. All randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials that addressed timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults were searched, appraised, analysed and summarized. The date of the latest search was 2002. Data were extracted independently and appraised according to the level of concealment of random allocation prior to formal entry; few and identifiable withdrawals and dropouts and an analysis based on an intention to treat. The relative risk for dichotomous data was calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Where data were insufficient to support quantitative analysis, a narrative overview was undertaken. Results.  Two trials of timed voiding met the inclusion criteria. In both, timed voiding was combined with other strategies. Participants were predominantly cognitively and physically impaired older women who resided in nursing home settings. Within-group improvements for the intervention groups were reported for both trials. One trial additionally reported a statistically significant reduction in night-time incontinence for the intervention group. The quality of the trials was modest and interpretation was limited by the potential for bias associated with inadequate concealment, missing data and no analysis by intention to treat. Conclusion.  Terms used to describe voiding programmes that involve a fixed interval of voiding are variable. No conclusions can be drawn at this point about the effectiveness of timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)420-431
JournalJournal of Advanced Nursing
Volume52
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2005

Fingerprint

Urinary Incontinence
Program Evaluation
Random Allocation
Nursing Homes
Randomized Controlled Trials
Confidence Intervals
Psychology
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

Ostaszkiewicz, Joan ; Roe, Brenda ; Johnston, Linda. / Effects of timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults: systematic review. In: Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005 ; Vol. 52, No. 4. pp. 420-431.
@article{3ba109fc758e404b8f1896e93c737e49,
title = "Effects of timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults: systematic review",
abstract = "Aim.  The aim of this paper is to present a systematic review assessing the effectiveness of timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults. Background.  Despite the widespread use of systematic voiding programmes, their effectiveness is unclear, and the evidence for timed voiding has not been subject to rigorous and systematic evaluation. The impact on psychosocial factors and cost is also untested. The physiological basis for timed voiding is also poorly established. Methods.  The systematic review incorporated the methodology of the Cochrane Collaboration. All randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials that addressed timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults were searched, appraised, analysed and summarized. The date of the latest search was 2002. Data were extracted independently and appraised according to the level of concealment of random allocation prior to formal entry; few and identifiable withdrawals and dropouts and an analysis based on an intention to treat. The relative risk for dichotomous data was calculated with 95{\%} confidence intervals. Where data were insufficient to support quantitative analysis, a narrative overview was undertaken. Results.  Two trials of timed voiding met the inclusion criteria. In both, timed voiding was combined with other strategies. Participants were predominantly cognitively and physically impaired older women who resided in nursing home settings. Within-group improvements for the intervention groups were reported for both trials. One trial additionally reported a statistically significant reduction in night-time incontinence for the intervention group. The quality of the trials was modest and interpretation was limited by the potential for bias associated with inadequate concealment, missing data and no analysis by intention to treat. Conclusion.  Terms used to describe voiding programmes that involve a fixed interval of voiding are variable. No conclusions can be drawn at this point about the effectiveness of timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults.",
author = "Joan Ostaszkiewicz and Brenda Roe and Linda Johnston",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03608.x",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "420--431",
journal = "Journal of Advanced Nursing",
issn = "0309-2402",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
number = "4",

}

Effects of timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults: systematic review. / Ostaszkiewicz, Joan; Roe, Brenda; Johnston, Linda.

In: Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 52, No. 4, 11.2005, p. 420-431.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults: systematic review

AU - Ostaszkiewicz, Joan

AU - Roe, Brenda

AU - Johnston, Linda

PY - 2005/11

Y1 - 2005/11

N2 - Aim.  The aim of this paper is to present a systematic review assessing the effectiveness of timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults. Background.  Despite the widespread use of systematic voiding programmes, their effectiveness is unclear, and the evidence for timed voiding has not been subject to rigorous and systematic evaluation. The impact on psychosocial factors and cost is also untested. The physiological basis for timed voiding is also poorly established. Methods.  The systematic review incorporated the methodology of the Cochrane Collaboration. All randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials that addressed timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults were searched, appraised, analysed and summarized. The date of the latest search was 2002. Data were extracted independently and appraised according to the level of concealment of random allocation prior to formal entry; few and identifiable withdrawals and dropouts and an analysis based on an intention to treat. The relative risk for dichotomous data was calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Where data were insufficient to support quantitative analysis, a narrative overview was undertaken. Results.  Two trials of timed voiding met the inclusion criteria. In both, timed voiding was combined with other strategies. Participants were predominantly cognitively and physically impaired older women who resided in nursing home settings. Within-group improvements for the intervention groups were reported for both trials. One trial additionally reported a statistically significant reduction in night-time incontinence for the intervention group. The quality of the trials was modest and interpretation was limited by the potential for bias associated with inadequate concealment, missing data and no analysis by intention to treat. Conclusion.  Terms used to describe voiding programmes that involve a fixed interval of voiding are variable. No conclusions can be drawn at this point about the effectiveness of timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults.

AB - Aim.  The aim of this paper is to present a systematic review assessing the effectiveness of timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults. Background.  Despite the widespread use of systematic voiding programmes, their effectiveness is unclear, and the evidence for timed voiding has not been subject to rigorous and systematic evaluation. The impact on psychosocial factors and cost is also untested. The physiological basis for timed voiding is also poorly established. Methods.  The systematic review incorporated the methodology of the Cochrane Collaboration. All randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials that addressed timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults were searched, appraised, analysed and summarized. The date of the latest search was 2002. Data were extracted independently and appraised according to the level of concealment of random allocation prior to formal entry; few and identifiable withdrawals and dropouts and an analysis based on an intention to treat. The relative risk for dichotomous data was calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Where data were insufficient to support quantitative analysis, a narrative overview was undertaken. Results.  Two trials of timed voiding met the inclusion criteria. In both, timed voiding was combined with other strategies. Participants were predominantly cognitively and physically impaired older women who resided in nursing home settings. Within-group improvements for the intervention groups were reported for both trials. One trial additionally reported a statistically significant reduction in night-time incontinence for the intervention group. The quality of the trials was modest and interpretation was limited by the potential for bias associated with inadequate concealment, missing data and no analysis by intention to treat. Conclusion.  Terms used to describe voiding programmes that involve a fixed interval of voiding are variable. No conclusions can be drawn at this point about the effectiveness of timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03608.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03608.x

M3 - Review article

VL - 52

SP - 420

EP - 431

JO - Journal of Advanced Nursing

JF - Journal of Advanced Nursing

SN - 0309-2402

IS - 4

ER -