Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analyses

Bruno Mazuquin, Maria Moffatt, Peter Gill, James Selfe, Jonathan Rees, Steve Drew, Chris Littlewood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (journal)peer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)
76 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effectiveness of early rehabilitation compared with delayed/standard rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair for pain, function, range of movement, strength, and repair integrity. Design Systematic review and meta-analyses. Methods We searched databases and included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early with delayed/standard rehabilitation for patients undergoing rotator cuff repair surgery. We assessed risk of bias of the RCTs using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Results Twenty RCTs, with 1841 patients, were included. The majority of the RCTs were of high or unclear risk of overall bias. We found substantial variations in the rehabilitation programmes, time in the sling and timing of exercise progression. We found no statistically significant differences for pain and function at any follow-up except for the outcome measure Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation at six months (MD: 6.54; 95%CI: 2.24?10.84) in favour of early rehabilitation. We found statistically significant differences in favour of early rehabilitation for shoulder flexion at six weeks (MD: 7.36; 95%CI: 2.66?12.06), three (MD: 8.45; 95%CI: 3.43?13.47) and six months (MD: 3.57; 95%CI: 0.81?6.32) and one year (MD: 1.42; 95%CI: 0.21?2.64) and similar differences for other planes of movement. In terms of repair integrity, early mobilisation does not seem to increase the risk of re-tears (OR:1.05; 95%CI: 0.64?1.75). Discussion Current approaches to early mobilisation, based largely on early introduction of passive movement, did not demonstrate significant differences in most clinical outcomes, although we found statistically significant differences in favour of early rehabilitation for range of movement. Importantly, there were no differences in repair integrity between early and delayed/standard rehabilitation. Most rehabilitation programmes did not consider early active movement as soon as the patient feels able. With ongoing variation in rehabilitation protocols there remains a need for large high quality RCT to inform the optimal approach to rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair surgery.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
JournalPLoS One
Early online date28 May 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 May 2021

Keywords

  • rehabilitation
  • rotator cuff repair

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this