TY - CHAP
T1 - “Dogs are supposed to be able to instinctively live with purpose”: Brian, Family Guy, and the Inevitable Anthropocentrism of Satire
T2 - Brian, Family Guy, and the Inevitable Anthropocentrism of Satire
AU - MILLS, BRETT
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2023/8/23
Y1 - 2023/8/23
N2 - This chapter examines the representation of Brian the dog in the animated American comedy series, Family Guy (1999–). Brian is an anthropomorphised animal representation, capable of speech, who sits within a long tradition of such depictions in animation. Such portrayals can be seen to trouble animal–human binaries, and Family Guy often mines this rupture for satirical effect. This satire often works to make explicit the power hierarchies in animal–human relationship, especially within the cultural category of the “pet”, which is the role Brian is required to fulfil for the human family he is a part of. Through examination of key moments in specific episodes, this chapter explores Brian’s complex shifting between modes of the human and the animal, and highlights the satirical potential this offers. However, it also notes that, in narrative terms, Brian often remains trapped within power structures that are not of his making and which are not to his benefit. As such, Family Guy is here explored in terms of its representational contradictions, evidencing satire here to be a comic form whose radical possibilities are, in this case, muted in anthropocentric ways.
AB - This chapter examines the representation of Brian the dog in the animated American comedy series, Family Guy (1999–). Brian is an anthropomorphised animal representation, capable of speech, who sits within a long tradition of such depictions in animation. Such portrayals can be seen to trouble animal–human binaries, and Family Guy often mines this rupture for satirical effect. This satire often works to make explicit the power hierarchies in animal–human relationship, especially within the cultural category of the “pet”, which is the role Brian is required to fulfil for the human family he is a part of. Through examination of key moments in specific episodes, this chapter explores Brian’s complex shifting between modes of the human and the animal, and highlights the satirical potential this offers. However, it also notes that, in narrative terms, Brian often remains trapped within power structures that are not of his making and which are not to his benefit. As such, Family Guy is here explored in terms of its representational contradictions, evidencing satire here to be a comic form whose radical possibilities are, in this case, muted in anthropocentric ways.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169011113&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85169011113&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-24872-6_19
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-24872-6_19
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85169011113
SN - 978-3031248719
T3 - Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature
SP - 313
EP - 331
BT - Animal Satire
A2 - Susan, McHugh
A2 - Robert, McKay
PB - Palgrave Macmillan
ER -