Do we practice what we preach?: an examination of the pedagogical beliefs of teacher educators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article is located within the context of teacher education in the UK which, in the last decade, has seen the introduction of government-led Qualified Teacher Status standards for initial teacher training. The study resides in the work of a university in the North-West of England, which is involved in the initial and postgraduate professional education of teachers. It examines firstly, the belief systems held by tutors engaged in this part of Higher Education, which might be characterised as their personal epistemology, and secondly, raises questions around these core beliefs, and how they are manifested at the pedagogical interface. The focus of the research rests on a perceived lack of congruence between the espoused ideology of tutors involved in initial teacher education, and the expectations of general classroom practice in this field. The degree to which this may have an impact on the concepts of teaching transmitted to course participants is examined, alongside a consideration of the clash of cultures experienced where dissonance exists between individual ideology and pedagogic identity. Examination of the same issues for tutors involved in postgraduate education, which is not subject to government-led standards, is used to contrast the pressures within each field.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)435-448
JournalTeaching in Higher Education
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

educator
examination
tutor
teacher
education
ideology
pedagogics
teacher training
epistemology
classroom
university
lack
Teaching

Cite this

@article{232f08f980ec458fa50364c6af792c12,
title = "Do we practice what we preach?: an examination of the pedagogical beliefs of teacher educators",
abstract = "This article is located within the context of teacher education in the UK which, in the last decade, has seen the introduction of government-led Qualified Teacher Status standards for initial teacher training. The study resides in the work of a university in the North-West of England, which is involved in the initial and postgraduate professional education of teachers. It examines firstly, the belief systems held by tutors engaged in this part of Higher Education, which might be characterised as their personal epistemology, and secondly, raises questions around these core beliefs, and how they are manifested at the pedagogical interface. The focus of the research rests on a perceived lack of congruence between the espoused ideology of tutors involved in initial teacher education, and the expectations of general classroom practice in this field. The degree to which this may have an impact on the concepts of teaching transmitted to course participants is examined, alongside a consideration of the clash of cultures experienced where dissonance exists between individual ideology and pedagogic identity. Examination of the same issues for tutors involved in postgraduate education, which is not subject to government-led standards, is used to contrast the pressures within each field.",
author = "F. Hallett",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/13562517.2010.493347",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "435--448",
journal = "Teaching in Higher Education",
issn = "1356-2517",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Do we practice what we preach?: an examination of the pedagogical beliefs of teacher educators. / Hallett, F.

In: Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2010, p. 435-448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do we practice what we preach?: an examination of the pedagogical beliefs of teacher educators

AU - Hallett, F.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This article is located within the context of teacher education in the UK which, in the last decade, has seen the introduction of government-led Qualified Teacher Status standards for initial teacher training. The study resides in the work of a university in the North-West of England, which is involved in the initial and postgraduate professional education of teachers. It examines firstly, the belief systems held by tutors engaged in this part of Higher Education, which might be characterised as their personal epistemology, and secondly, raises questions around these core beliefs, and how they are manifested at the pedagogical interface. The focus of the research rests on a perceived lack of congruence between the espoused ideology of tutors involved in initial teacher education, and the expectations of general classroom practice in this field. The degree to which this may have an impact on the concepts of teaching transmitted to course participants is examined, alongside a consideration of the clash of cultures experienced where dissonance exists between individual ideology and pedagogic identity. Examination of the same issues for tutors involved in postgraduate education, which is not subject to government-led standards, is used to contrast the pressures within each field.

AB - This article is located within the context of teacher education in the UK which, in the last decade, has seen the introduction of government-led Qualified Teacher Status standards for initial teacher training. The study resides in the work of a university in the North-West of England, which is involved in the initial and postgraduate professional education of teachers. It examines firstly, the belief systems held by tutors engaged in this part of Higher Education, which might be characterised as their personal epistemology, and secondly, raises questions around these core beliefs, and how they are manifested at the pedagogical interface. The focus of the research rests on a perceived lack of congruence between the espoused ideology of tutors involved in initial teacher education, and the expectations of general classroom practice in this field. The degree to which this may have an impact on the concepts of teaching transmitted to course participants is examined, alongside a consideration of the clash of cultures experienced where dissonance exists between individual ideology and pedagogic identity. Examination of the same issues for tutors involved in postgraduate education, which is not subject to government-led standards, is used to contrast the pressures within each field.

U2 - 10.1080/13562517.2010.493347

DO - 10.1080/13562517.2010.493347

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 435

EP - 448

JO - Teaching in Higher Education

JF - Teaching in Higher Education

SN - 1356-2517

IS - 4

ER -