Do public consultations matter? The case of the Social Services and Wellbeing (Wales) Bill

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Abstract Background: The Welsh Government has embarked on significant legislative projects since devolution. Welsh legislative efforts are however marked by the low scrutenizing capacity of a relatively small legislative chamber and limited civil service ability to prepare legislation. This means that the Welsh Government relies more heavily on input through public consultations prior to parliamentary scrutiny and external expertise. The study investigated the public consultation (stage 1) for the Social Services and Wellbeing (Wales) Bill (2013).3 Aims and Objectives: This was a pilot study to develop and test a coding matrix to analyse public consultations by devolved governments. The aim was to design and test the coding matrix through a small case study (the Welsh Social Services Bill) and to assess its utility for subsequent large scale comparative studies across devolved governments in the UK. Method: Following a literature review a coding matrix was designed to analyse consultation submissions. We then fed the publicly available data of the Social Service Bill (Wales) consultation (stage 1) in 2012/13 into the matrix. Descriptive statistics were conducted and the content of a sub-sample of purposively selected submissions were analysed in more detail. Results: The public consultation contained 84 submissions from various organisations and private individuals. The results demonstrate that consultation responses come from a wide range of actors, that there is some limited amount of interaction prior to submission between respondents, and that there is a significant amount of ʻwhite noiseʼ, submissions that are not related to the topic. The analysis also revealed that a significant number of participants use the consultation as an opportunity to engage in self-advocacy. Organisational analysis of participants also reveals some imbalance of submissions by sector. Conclusion: Public consultations are a useful mechanism to improve legislation prior to parliamentary debate through canvassing stakeholders and our study showed that the consultation provoked a range of responses from a wider variety of stakeholders. There is however some serious doubt whether the chosen technique matched the aims and objective of the consultation. This raises questions about tokenism, the role of external expertise and the ability of devolved governments to use consultations as a core mechanism for citizen and stakeholder engagement.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 30 Oct 2014
Event64th Annual International Conference: Rebels and Radicals - Manchester, United Kingdom
Duration: 16 Apr 2014 → …

Conference

Conference64th Annual International Conference: Rebels and Radicals
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityManchester
Period16/04/14 → …

Fingerprint

mobile social services
coding
stakeholder
expertise
legislation
organizational analysis
parliamentary debate
civil service
ability
descriptive statistics
chamber
decentralization
citizen
interaction

Cite this

Kaehne, A. (2014). Do public consultations matter? The case of the Social Services and Wellbeing (Wales) Bill. Paper presented at 64th Annual International Conference: Rebels and Radicals, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Kaehne, Axel. / Do public consultations matter? The case of the Social Services and Wellbeing (Wales) Bill. Paper presented at 64th Annual International Conference: Rebels and Radicals, Manchester, United Kingdom.
@conference{b31b21380eb348098b054a4e8bcdfdeb,
title = "Do public consultations matter? The case of the Social Services and Wellbeing (Wales) Bill",
abstract = "Abstract Background: The Welsh Government has embarked on significant legislative projects since devolution. Welsh legislative efforts are however marked by the low scrutenizing capacity of a relatively small legislative chamber and limited civil service ability to prepare legislation. This means that the Welsh Government relies more heavily on input through public consultations prior to parliamentary scrutiny and external expertise. The study investigated the public consultation (stage 1) for the Social Services and Wellbeing (Wales) Bill (2013).3 Aims and Objectives: This was a pilot study to develop and test a coding matrix to analyse public consultations by devolved governments. The aim was to design and test the coding matrix through a small case study (the Welsh Social Services Bill) and to assess its utility for subsequent large scale comparative studies across devolved governments in the UK. Method: Following a literature review a coding matrix was designed to analyse consultation submissions. We then fed the publicly available data of the Social Service Bill (Wales) consultation (stage 1) in 2012/13 into the matrix. Descriptive statistics were conducted and the content of a sub-sample of purposively selected submissions were analysed in more detail. Results: The public consultation contained 84 submissions from various organisations and private individuals. The results demonstrate that consultation responses come from a wide range of actors, that there is some limited amount of interaction prior to submission between respondents, and that there is a significant amount of ʻwhite noiseʼ, submissions that are not related to the topic. The analysis also revealed that a significant number of participants use the consultation as an opportunity to engage in self-advocacy. Organisational analysis of participants also reveals some imbalance of submissions by sector. Conclusion: Public consultations are a useful mechanism to improve legislation prior to parliamentary debate through canvassing stakeholders and our study showed that the consultation provoked a range of responses from a wider variety of stakeholders. There is however some serious doubt whether the chosen technique matched the aims and objective of the consultation. This raises questions about tokenism, the role of external expertise and the ability of devolved governments to use consultations as a core mechanism for citizen and stakeholder engagement.",
author = "Axel Kaehne",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "30",
language = "English",
note = "64th Annual International Conference: Rebels and Radicals ; Conference date: 16-04-2014",

}

Kaehne, A 2014, 'Do public consultations matter? The case of the Social Services and Wellbeing (Wales) Bill' Paper presented at 64th Annual International Conference: Rebels and Radicals, Manchester, United Kingdom, 16/04/14, .

Do public consultations matter? The case of the Social Services and Wellbeing (Wales) Bill. / Kaehne, Axel.

2014. Paper presented at 64th Annual International Conference: Rebels and Radicals, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Do public consultations matter? The case of the Social Services and Wellbeing (Wales) Bill

AU - Kaehne, Axel

PY - 2014/10/30

Y1 - 2014/10/30

N2 - Abstract Background: The Welsh Government has embarked on significant legislative projects since devolution. Welsh legislative efforts are however marked by the low scrutenizing capacity of a relatively small legislative chamber and limited civil service ability to prepare legislation. This means that the Welsh Government relies more heavily on input through public consultations prior to parliamentary scrutiny and external expertise. The study investigated the public consultation (stage 1) for the Social Services and Wellbeing (Wales) Bill (2013).3 Aims and Objectives: This was a pilot study to develop and test a coding matrix to analyse public consultations by devolved governments. The aim was to design and test the coding matrix through a small case study (the Welsh Social Services Bill) and to assess its utility for subsequent large scale comparative studies across devolved governments in the UK. Method: Following a literature review a coding matrix was designed to analyse consultation submissions. We then fed the publicly available data of the Social Service Bill (Wales) consultation (stage 1) in 2012/13 into the matrix. Descriptive statistics were conducted and the content of a sub-sample of purposively selected submissions were analysed in more detail. Results: The public consultation contained 84 submissions from various organisations and private individuals. The results demonstrate that consultation responses come from a wide range of actors, that there is some limited amount of interaction prior to submission between respondents, and that there is a significant amount of ʻwhite noiseʼ, submissions that are not related to the topic. The analysis also revealed that a significant number of participants use the consultation as an opportunity to engage in self-advocacy. Organisational analysis of participants also reveals some imbalance of submissions by sector. Conclusion: Public consultations are a useful mechanism to improve legislation prior to parliamentary debate through canvassing stakeholders and our study showed that the consultation provoked a range of responses from a wider variety of stakeholders. There is however some serious doubt whether the chosen technique matched the aims and objective of the consultation. This raises questions about tokenism, the role of external expertise and the ability of devolved governments to use consultations as a core mechanism for citizen and stakeholder engagement.

AB - Abstract Background: The Welsh Government has embarked on significant legislative projects since devolution. Welsh legislative efforts are however marked by the low scrutenizing capacity of a relatively small legislative chamber and limited civil service ability to prepare legislation. This means that the Welsh Government relies more heavily on input through public consultations prior to parliamentary scrutiny and external expertise. The study investigated the public consultation (stage 1) for the Social Services and Wellbeing (Wales) Bill (2013).3 Aims and Objectives: This was a pilot study to develop and test a coding matrix to analyse public consultations by devolved governments. The aim was to design and test the coding matrix through a small case study (the Welsh Social Services Bill) and to assess its utility for subsequent large scale comparative studies across devolved governments in the UK. Method: Following a literature review a coding matrix was designed to analyse consultation submissions. We then fed the publicly available data of the Social Service Bill (Wales) consultation (stage 1) in 2012/13 into the matrix. Descriptive statistics were conducted and the content of a sub-sample of purposively selected submissions were analysed in more detail. Results: The public consultation contained 84 submissions from various organisations and private individuals. The results demonstrate that consultation responses come from a wide range of actors, that there is some limited amount of interaction prior to submission between respondents, and that there is a significant amount of ʻwhite noiseʼ, submissions that are not related to the topic. The analysis also revealed that a significant number of participants use the consultation as an opportunity to engage in self-advocacy. Organisational analysis of participants also reveals some imbalance of submissions by sector. Conclusion: Public consultations are a useful mechanism to improve legislation prior to parliamentary debate through canvassing stakeholders and our study showed that the consultation provoked a range of responses from a wider variety of stakeholders. There is however some serious doubt whether the chosen technique matched the aims and objective of the consultation. This raises questions about tokenism, the role of external expertise and the ability of devolved governments to use consultations as a core mechanism for citizen and stakeholder engagement.

UR - http://www.psa.ac.uk/events/conference-highlights-2014

M3 - Paper

ER -

Kaehne A. Do public consultations matter? The case of the Social Services and Wellbeing (Wales) Bill. 2014. Paper presented at 64th Annual International Conference: Rebels and Radicals, Manchester, United Kingdom.