Digital Vaginal Assessment: An inter-tester reliability study

S.M. Jayaseelan, J Haslam, J Winstanley, Brenda Roe, J.A. Oldham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose A variety of methods may be employed to assess pelvic floor muscle activity, the most widely used being digital vaginal assessment. However, this is a subjective form of assessment and consequently there are issues concerning reliability when two or more clinicians are involved in assessment before and after treatment of patients with urinary incontinence. This article presents the results of a study assessing inter-tester reliability between four clinicians on three different sites. Methods Thirty patients (ten for each clinician from three sites) were assessed by four clinicians. One clinician from each of the three sites was compared to a fourth. Each patient was assessed twice (once by clinician 1, 2 or 3 and once by clinician 4). All four clinicians adhered to the same written protocol and were prevented from conferring until the end of the investigation. Results For clinicians 1 and 3 there were few discrepancies between their scores and those of clinician 4. However, initially there were considerable differences in assessment techniques between clinicians 2 and 4. After appropriate training the disparity between these two clinicians was considerably reduced. Conclusions Inter-tester reliability should not be assumed between clinicians and should be established when two or more clinicians are involved in pre-and post-treatment assessment. If disparity does occur between assessors the difference in assessment technique may be overcome with appropriate training.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243-250
JournalPhysiotherapy
Volume87
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Pelvic Floor
Urinary Incontinence
Muscles
Therapeutics

Cite this

Jayaseelan, S. M., Haslam, J., Winstanley, J., Roe, B., & Oldham, J. A. (2001). Digital Vaginal Assessment: An inter-tester reliability study. Physiotherapy, 87(5), 243-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60785-7
Jayaseelan, S.M. ; Haslam, J ; Winstanley, J ; Roe, Brenda ; Oldham, J.A. / Digital Vaginal Assessment: An inter-tester reliability study. In: Physiotherapy. 2001 ; Vol. 87, No. 5. pp. 243-250.
@article{6de5c4b6494f48ada71d068ade18e77c,
title = "Digital Vaginal Assessment: An inter-tester reliability study",
abstract = "Background and Purpose A variety of methods may be employed to assess pelvic floor muscle activity, the most widely used being digital vaginal assessment. However, this is a subjective form of assessment and consequently there are issues concerning reliability when two or more clinicians are involved in assessment before and after treatment of patients with urinary incontinence. This article presents the results of a study assessing inter-tester reliability between four clinicians on three different sites. Methods Thirty patients (ten for each clinician from three sites) were assessed by four clinicians. One clinician from each of the three sites was compared to a fourth. Each patient was assessed twice (once by clinician 1, 2 or 3 and once by clinician 4). All four clinicians adhered to the same written protocol and were prevented from conferring until the end of the investigation. Results For clinicians 1 and 3 there were few discrepancies between their scores and those of clinician 4. However, initially there were considerable differences in assessment techniques between clinicians 2 and 4. After appropriate training the disparity between these two clinicians was considerably reduced. Conclusions Inter-tester reliability should not be assumed between clinicians and should be established when two or more clinicians are involved in pre-and post-treatment assessment. If disparity does occur between assessors the difference in assessment technique may be overcome with appropriate training.",
author = "S.M. Jayaseelan and J Haslam and J Winstanley and Brenda Roe and J.A. Oldham",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60785-7",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "243--250",
journal = "Physiotherapy",
issn = "0031-9406",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

Jayaseelan, SM, Haslam, J, Winstanley, J, Roe, B & Oldham, JA 2001, 'Digital Vaginal Assessment: An inter-tester reliability study', Physiotherapy, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 243-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60785-7

Digital Vaginal Assessment: An inter-tester reliability study. / Jayaseelan, S.M.; Haslam, J; Winstanley, J; Roe, Brenda; Oldham, J.A.

In: Physiotherapy, Vol. 87, No. 5, 2001, p. 243-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Digital Vaginal Assessment: An inter-tester reliability study

AU - Jayaseelan, S.M.

AU - Haslam, J

AU - Winstanley, J

AU - Roe, Brenda

AU - Oldham, J.A.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Background and Purpose A variety of methods may be employed to assess pelvic floor muscle activity, the most widely used being digital vaginal assessment. However, this is a subjective form of assessment and consequently there are issues concerning reliability when two or more clinicians are involved in assessment before and after treatment of patients with urinary incontinence. This article presents the results of a study assessing inter-tester reliability between four clinicians on three different sites. Methods Thirty patients (ten for each clinician from three sites) were assessed by four clinicians. One clinician from each of the three sites was compared to a fourth. Each patient was assessed twice (once by clinician 1, 2 or 3 and once by clinician 4). All four clinicians adhered to the same written protocol and were prevented from conferring until the end of the investigation. Results For clinicians 1 and 3 there were few discrepancies between their scores and those of clinician 4. However, initially there were considerable differences in assessment techniques between clinicians 2 and 4. After appropriate training the disparity between these two clinicians was considerably reduced. Conclusions Inter-tester reliability should not be assumed between clinicians and should be established when two or more clinicians are involved in pre-and post-treatment assessment. If disparity does occur between assessors the difference in assessment technique may be overcome with appropriate training.

AB - Background and Purpose A variety of methods may be employed to assess pelvic floor muscle activity, the most widely used being digital vaginal assessment. However, this is a subjective form of assessment and consequently there are issues concerning reliability when two or more clinicians are involved in assessment before and after treatment of patients with urinary incontinence. This article presents the results of a study assessing inter-tester reliability between four clinicians on three different sites. Methods Thirty patients (ten for each clinician from three sites) were assessed by four clinicians. One clinician from each of the three sites was compared to a fourth. Each patient was assessed twice (once by clinician 1, 2 or 3 and once by clinician 4). All four clinicians adhered to the same written protocol and were prevented from conferring until the end of the investigation. Results For clinicians 1 and 3 there were few discrepancies between their scores and those of clinician 4. However, initially there were considerable differences in assessment techniques between clinicians 2 and 4. After appropriate training the disparity between these two clinicians was considerably reduced. Conclusions Inter-tester reliability should not be assumed between clinicians and should be established when two or more clinicians are involved in pre-and post-treatment assessment. If disparity does occur between assessors the difference in assessment technique may be overcome with appropriate training.

U2 - 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60785-7

DO - 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60785-7

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 243

EP - 250

JO - Physiotherapy

JF - Physiotherapy

SN - 0031-9406

IS - 5

ER -

Jayaseelan SM, Haslam J, Winstanley J, Roe B, Oldham JA. Digital Vaginal Assessment: An inter-tester reliability study. Physiotherapy. 2001;87(5):243-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60785-7