Abstract
Background
Recent consensus guidelines state that acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may be diagnosed in the context of a troponin rise above the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit (URL) with the optimal imprecision of the assay (coefficient of variation, CV) being ≤10%. However, at the 99th percentile, modern assays do not have a CV ≤10%.
Objective
The authors compared the prognostic implications of placing the diagnostic troponin cut-off at the 99th percentile and at the lowest concentration with a CV ≤10% (functional sensitivity).
Methods
The authors prospectively recruited 804 patients presenting to the Emergency Department of a university-affiliated teaching hospital with suspected ACS. All patients underwent 12 h troponin T testing and were followed up by telephone and chart review.
Outcomes
Death or AMI (excluding the index event) and the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) within 6 months.
Results
Troponin T elevation below the functional sensitivity predicted the risk of death and AMI (adjusted OR 4.6, p=0.039) and MACE (adjusted OR 11.10, p<0.0001) independently of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk score and creatinine levels. Utilising the 99th percentile cut-off, an extra 17 MACEs could be predicted per 1000 patients treated at a cost of identifying 11 patients who would not have developed an event.
Conclusions
The results suggest that adopting the lower troponin cut-off would reduce the proportion of ‘false negatives’ (patients with negative troponin who develop MACE) from 9.6% to 8.9%. Whether this reduction in ‘false negatives’ justifies the increase in ‘false positives’ warrants further investigation and discussion.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 292-296 |
| Journal | Emergency Medicine Journal |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnosing acute myocardial infarction with troponins: how low can you go?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver