TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a core outcome set for lateral elbow tendinopathy (COS-LET) using best available evidence and an international consensus process
AU - Bateman, Marcus
AU - Evans, Jonathan P.
AU - Vuvan, Viana
AU - Jones, Val
AU - Watts, Adam C.
AU - Phadnis, Joideep
AU - Bisset, Leanne M.
AU - Vicenzino, Bill
AU - Andia, Isabel
AU - Arrigoni, Paolo
AU - Aydin, Canan
AU - Barratt, Paul
AU - Chidambaram, Ram
AU - Cleland, Joshua
AU - Coombes, Brooke
AU - Farkash, Uri
AU - Gosens, Taco
AU - Heales, Luke
AU - Kroslak, Martin
AU - Littlewood, Chris
AU - MacDermid, Joy
AU - Murrell, George
AU - Olaussen, Morten
AU - Orchard, John
AU - Pienimaki, Tuomo
AU - Rangan, Amar
AU - Solheim, Eirik
AU - Stasinopoulos, Dimitrios
AU - Thomas, Jill
AU - Tyler, Timothy
AU - Van Der Windt, Danielle
AU - Van Riet, Roger
AU - Wang, Allan
AU - Waugh, Esther
AU - Wolf, Jennifer Moriatis
AU - Wright, Tony
AU - Zeisig, Eva
AU - Zheng, Ming Hao
AU - Mistry, Priyesh
AU - Newsome, Ruth
AU - Ford, Mark
AU - Jackson, Karen
AU - Le, Phuong
AU - Song, Joo Yeun
AU - COS-LET Authorship Group
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This work is not funded and relies on the individuals involved donating their time. Open access publication fees were funded by the University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust Charity.
Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022.
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - Objectives To develop a core outcome set for lateral elbow tendinopathy (COS-LET) and to provide guidance for outcome evaluation in future studies. Methods We implemented a multi-stage mixed-methods design combining two systematic reviews, domain mapping of outcome measurement instruments to the core domains of tendinopathy, psychometric analysis of instruments, two patient focus groups and a Delphi study incorporating two surveys and an international consensus meeting. Following the OMERACT guidelines, we used a 70% threshold for consensus. Results 38 clinicians/researchers and 9 patients participated. 60 instruments were assessed for inclusion. The only instrument that was recommended for the COS-LET was Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) for the disability domain. Interim recommendations were made to use: the PRTEE function subscale for the function domain; PRTEE pain subscale items 1, 4 and 5 for the pain over a specified time domain; pain-free grip strength for the physical function capacity domain; a Numerical Rating Scale measuring pain on gripping for the pain on activity/loading domain; and time off work for the participation in life activities domain. No recommendations could be made for the quality-of-life, patient rating of condition and psychological factors domains. Conclusions The COS-LET comprises the PRTEE for the disability domain. Interim-use recommendations included PRTEE subscales, time off work, pain-free grip strength and a Numerical Rating Scale measuring pain on gripping. Further work is required to validate these interim measures and develop suitable measures to capture the other domains.
AB - Objectives To develop a core outcome set for lateral elbow tendinopathy (COS-LET) and to provide guidance for outcome evaluation in future studies. Methods We implemented a multi-stage mixed-methods design combining two systematic reviews, domain mapping of outcome measurement instruments to the core domains of tendinopathy, psychometric analysis of instruments, two patient focus groups and a Delphi study incorporating two surveys and an international consensus meeting. Following the OMERACT guidelines, we used a 70% threshold for consensus. Results 38 clinicians/researchers and 9 patients participated. 60 instruments were assessed for inclusion. The only instrument that was recommended for the COS-LET was Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) for the disability domain. Interim recommendations were made to use: the PRTEE function subscale for the function domain; PRTEE pain subscale items 1, 4 and 5 for the pain over a specified time domain; pain-free grip strength for the physical function capacity domain; a Numerical Rating Scale measuring pain on gripping for the pain on activity/loading domain; and time off work for the participation in life activities domain. No recommendations could be made for the quality-of-life, patient rating of condition and psychological factors domains. Conclusions The COS-LET comprises the PRTEE for the disability domain. Interim-use recommendations included PRTEE subscales, time off work, pain-free grip strength and a Numerical Rating Scale measuring pain on gripping. Further work is required to validate these interim measures and develop suitable measures to capture the other domains.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131217443&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131217443&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105044
DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105044
M3 - Article (journal)
C2 - 35135827
AN - SCOPUS:85131217443
SN - 0306-3674
VL - 56
SP - 657
EP - 666
JO - British journal of sports medicine
JF - British journal of sports medicine
IS - 12
ER -