TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing the SELF study
T2 - A focus group with patients and the public
AU - Littlewood, Chris
AU - Ashton, Jon
AU - Scott, Emma
AU - Mawson, Sue
AU - May, Stephen
AU - Walters, Stephen
PY - 2013/4/1
Y1 - 2013/4/1
N2 - Background: Patient and public involvement (PPI) in the research process is a key feature of NHS Research and Development policy but reporting of the extent and value of PPI in relation to physiotherapy research is lacking. Aims: To determine whether the proposed methodology within the randomized controlled trial aspect of the SELF study was acceptable to patients and to ascertain whether enhancements could be made in relation to elements that matter most to patients. Methods: A focus group discussion was undertaken with four lay people who were currently attending physiotherapy. The data was transcribed verbatim and analysed using the framework method. Findings: The lay members found the proposals to be generally acceptable but were able to suggest enhancements to the SELF study's design relating to recruitment, retention, blinding, and acceptability of the intervention. Additionally, we were able to recruit lay members to the trial steering committee. Conclusion: The unique perspective offered by PPI has resulted in enhancements to the SELF study's design and a means of maintaining PPI throughout the conduct of the SELF study has been established.
AB - Background: Patient and public involvement (PPI) in the research process is a key feature of NHS Research and Development policy but reporting of the extent and value of PPI in relation to physiotherapy research is lacking. Aims: To determine whether the proposed methodology within the randomized controlled trial aspect of the SELF study was acceptable to patients and to ascertain whether enhancements could be made in relation to elements that matter most to patients. Methods: A focus group discussion was undertaken with four lay people who were currently attending physiotherapy. The data was transcribed verbatim and analysed using the framework method. Findings: The lay members found the proposals to be generally acceptable but were able to suggest enhancements to the SELF study's design relating to recruitment, retention, blinding, and acceptability of the intervention. Additionally, we were able to recruit lay members to the trial steering committee. Conclusion: The unique perspective offered by PPI has resulted in enhancements to the SELF study's design and a means of maintaining PPI throughout the conduct of the SELF study has been established.
KW - Focus group
KW - Patient and public involvement (PPI)
KW - Research design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876063872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876063872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.12968/ijtr.2013.20.4.200
DO - 10.12968/ijtr.2013.20.4.200
M3 - Article (journal)
AN - SCOPUS:84876063872
SN - 1741-1645
VL - 20
SP - 200
EP - 206
JO - International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation
JF - International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation
IS - 4
ER -